Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021305›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2020

Comparison of Gut Microbiome in Human Colorectal Cancer in Paired Tumor and Adjacent Normal Tissues.

Qin-Song Sheng, Kang-Xin He, Jian-Jiong Li, Zi-Feng Zhong, Fei-Xia Wang, Le-Lin Pan, Jian-Jiang Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The gut microbiota and its biogeography.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qin-Song ShengDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6059-0458
Kang-Xin HeState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Jiong LiDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, People's Republic of China.
Zi-Feng ZhongDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Fei-Xia WangDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Le-Lin PanDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2244-7300
Jian-Jiang LinDepartment of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2813-3238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo understand the biological effect of gut microbiome on the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC), we sequenced the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene to illustrate the overall structure of microbiota in the CRC patients.

methodsIn this study, a total of 66 CRC patients were dichotomized into different groups based on the following characteristics: paired tumor and adjacent normal tissues, distal and proximal CRC segments, MMR (-) and MMR (+), different TNM staging and clinic tumor staging.

resultsBy sequencing and comparing the microbial assemblages, our results indicated that 7 microbe genus (

conclusionAll these findings implied a better understanding of the alteration in the gut microbiome, which may offer new insight into diagnosing and therapying for CRC patients.

Indexed as

16S rRNA sequencingcolorectal cancerCRCgut microbiotaMMRTNM staging

Identifiers

PMID32021305
PMCPMC6982458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.