Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021232›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2020

Bleeding Management Practices of Australian Cardiac Surgeons, Anesthesiologists and Perfusionists: A Cross-Sectional National Survey Incorporating the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B Model.

Bronwyn L Pearse, Samantha Keogh, Claire M Rickard, Daniel J Faulke, Ian Smith, Douglas Wall, Charles McDonald, Yoke L Fung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Effects of In-House Cryoprecipitate Use on Transfusion Volume for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bronwyn L PearseSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0048-620X
Samantha KeoghSchool of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
Claire M RickardSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6341-7415
Daniel J FaulkeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perfusion, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
Ian SmithDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perfusion, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-4706
Douglas WallDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
Charles McDonaldDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perfusion, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
Yoke L FungSchool of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7777-6179
Prince Charles Hospital · AUGriffith University · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExcessive bleeding is an acknowledged consequence of cardiac surgery, occurring in up to 10% of adult patients. This clinically important complication leads to poorer patient outcomes. Clinical practice guidelines are available to support best practice however variability in bleeding management practice and related adverse outcomes still exist. This study had two objectives: 1) to gain insight into current bleeding management practice for adult cardiac surgery in Australia and how that compared to guidelines and literature; and 2) to understand perceived difficulties clinicians face implementing improvements in bleeding management.

methodsA national cross-sectional questionnaire survey was utilized. Perspectives were sought from cardiac surgeons, cardiac anesthesiologists and perfusionists. Thirty-nine closed-ended questions focused on routine bleeding management practices to address pre and intra-operative care. One open-ended question was asked; "What would assist you to improve bleeding management with cardiac surgery patients?" Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS. Qualitative data were categorized into the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework; the domains were then mapped to the COM-B model.

resultsSurvey responses from 159 Anesthesiologists, 39 cardiac surgeons and 86 perfusionists were included (response rate 37%). Four of the recommendations queried in this survey were reported as routinely adhered to < 50% of the time, 9 queried recommendations were adhered to 51-75% of the time and 4 recommendations were routinely followed >76% of the time.

conclusionThere is a wide variation in peri-operative bleeding management practice among cardiac anaesthesiologists, surgeons and perfusionists in Australian cardiac surgery units. Conceptualizing factors believed necessary to improve practice with the TDF and COM-B model found that bleeding management could be improved with a standardized approach including; point of care diagnostic assays, a bleeding management algorithm, access to concentrated coagulation factors, cardiac surgery specific bleeding management education, multidisciplinary team agreement and support, and an overarching national approach.

Indexed as

bleedingcardiac surgeryclinical practice guidelinesimplementationmultidisciplinarytheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID32021232
PMCPMC6970603
OpenAlexW3000329980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.