Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021227›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2020

Understanding the early mortality benefit observed in the PARADIGM-HF trial: considerations for the management of heart failure with sacubitril/valsartan.

George G Sokos, Amresh Raina

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01035255 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01035255 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2009 to 2014Enrolled8,442ConditionsHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionArmsLCZ696 200 mg BID, Enalapril 10 mg BID
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors.World journal of cardiology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Current approaches used in treating COVID-19 from a molecular mechanisms and immune response perspective.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

George G SokosDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Amresh RainaPulmonary Hypertension Program, Section of Heart Failure/Transplant/MCS & Pulmonary Hypertension, Allegheny General Hospital, AGH McGinnis Cardiovascular Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Allegheny General Hospital · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to elucidate the optimal dosing of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy in the heart failure (HF) treatment paradigm through examination of the trial population characteristics and the mortality benefit observed in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF; NCT01035255) trial. Considerations regarding the initiation and titration of sacubitril/valsartan, a first-in-class ARNI, will also be addressed. The approval of sacubitril/valsartan heralded the first novel pharmacological class in over a decade for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The PARADIGM-HF trial showed that treatment with valsartan/valsartan reduced the risk of first occurrence of either cardiovascular death or HF-related hospitalization (composite primary endpoint) by 20% compared with enalapril in patients with HFrEF. The incremental benefits of treatment with valsartan/valsartan over enalapril demonstrated in the PARADIGM-HF trial led to strong recommendations for its use over ACEIs or angiotensin receptor blockers to further reduce morbidity and mortality in the 2016 and 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America updates to the guidelines for the management of HF. Although the optimal timing for the initiation of valsartan/valsartan has yet to be determined, its early use is likely to have a positive impact on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AminobutyratesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersBiphenyl CompoundsClinical Trials as TopicDrug CombinationsHeart FailureHumansNeprilysinProtease InhibitorsRisk FactorsTetrazolesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeValsartanAminobutyratesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsNeprilysinProtease Inhibitorssacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanangiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitorcardiovascular deathpatient outcomestreatment recommendations

Identifiers

PMID32021227
PMCPMC6972579
OpenAlexW2999687400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.