Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021091›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2020

Protective Effects of Chlorogenic Acid on Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Rats by Regulating Oxidative Stress-Related Nrf2 Pathway.

Dequan Liu, Huilin Wang, Yangang Zhang, Zhan Zhang

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Therapeutic Potential ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dequan LiuDepartment of Neurology, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Luoyang, Henan 471000, People's Republic of China.
Huilin WangDepartment of Neurology, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Luoyang, Henan 471000, People's Republic of China.
Yangang ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710003, People's Republic of China.
Zhan ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710003, People's Republic of China.
Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University · CNXi’an Children’s Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCerebral ischemia-reperfusion (CI/R) injury is caused by blood flow recovery after ischemic stroke. Chlorogenic acid (CGA, 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid) is a major polyphenol component of MATERIALS: In this study, CI/R rat model was constructed. The rats were randomly divided into nine groups with ten in each group: Control, CGA (500 mg·kg-1), CI/R, CI/R + CGA (20 mg·kg-1), CI/R + CGA (100 mg·kg-1), CI/R + CGA (500 mg·kg-1), ML385 (30 mg·kg-1), CI/R + ML385 (30 mg·kg-1), CI/R + CGA + ML385. Cerebral infarction volume was detected by TTC staining. Brain pathological damage was detected by H&E staining. Apoptosis of cortical cells was detected by TUNEL staining. The expression of related proteins was detected by RT-qPCR and Western blotting.

resultsStep-down test and Y maze test showed that CGA dose-dependently mitigated CI/R-induced brain damage and enhanced learning and spatial memory. Besides, CGA promoted the expression of BDNF and NGF in a dose-dependent manner and alleviated CI/R-induced nerve injury. Moreover, CGA increased the activity of SOD and the level of GSH, as well as decreased production of ROS and LDH and the accumulation of MDA. Notably, CGA attenuated oxidative stress-induced brain injury and apoptosis and inhibited the expression of apoptosis-related proteins (cleaved caspase 3 and caspase 9). Additionally, CGA reversed CI/R induced inactivation of Nrf2 pathway and promoted Nrf2, NQO-1 and HO-1 expression. Nrf2 pathway inhibitor ML385 destroyed this promotion. DISCUSSION: All the data indicated that CGA had a neuroprotective effect on the CI/R rats by regulating oxidative stress-related Nrf2 pathway.

Indexed as

Oxidative StressAdministration, OralAnimalsBrain IschemiaChlorogenic AcidDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleMaze LearningNF-E2-Related Factor 2Protective AgentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReperfusion InjuryStructure-Activity RelationshipChlorogenic AcidNfe2l2 protein, ratNF-E2-Related Factor 2Protective Agentscerebral ischemia/reperfusion injurychlorogenic acidneuroprotectionNF-E2-related factor 2 pathwayoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID32021091
PMCPMC6954849
OpenAlexW2997814279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.