ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
A comparison of PROMIS Global Health-Mental and legacy orthopedic outcome measures for evaluating preoperative mental health status.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 global compared to the neck disability index in patients undergoing 1 and 2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Patient Satisfaction Following Lumbar Fusion Is Associated With Functional Status and Pain More Than the Attainment of Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Implications for Value-Based Medicine.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The influence of mental health on postoperative outcomes necessitates comparison of the mental health constructs captured by patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). 1,026 patients completed preoperative PROMs including the PROMIS Physical Function (PF), PROMIS Global Health (GH), and a subspecialty-specific PROM. Across specialties, PROMIS GH-Physical, PF-CAT, and PF-SF scores correlated more strongly with all legacy PROMs than the GH-Mental score. Moderate to strong correlation between the PF-SF, PF-CAT, and GH-Physical questionnaires and subspecialty-specific PROMs across specialties suggest they assess similar concepts. Lower correlation between the GH-Mental and subspecialty-specific PROMs suggest that the GH-Mental questionnaire captures distinct patient-reported mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.