ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Resuscitation in hip fractures: The practicality and clinical effectiveness of pre-operative resuscitation of patients with hip fracture using blood products.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to determine the practicality and estimate the effect of administering pre-operative blood product resuscitation to a consecutive, prospectively recruited cohort of 100 patients admitted to a single centre with a hip fracture with all other treatment unchanged.
method100 patients aged 65 years or over admitted acutely to our unit with unilateral fractured femoral neck during the study period were included in this study, regardless of cognitive function. Patients were excluded only if there were relevant medical comorbidities or consent was declined. Each patient was resuscitated with a single unit of packed red cells in the immediate perioperative period in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was to establish the feasibility of the study protocol employed in using blood products to resuscitate eligible patients and recording reasons for any failures to include eligible patients. Additional data regarding mortality at 30 days following injury, subsequent blood product use, any transfusion related adverse reactions and total blood product use was measured.
resultsWe were able to show that it is safe and practicable to deliver blood as an early resuscitative strategy in the frail elderly hip fracture population. The mortality rate of the study cohort was 3%. No adverse reaction was observed in any of the 99 patients given blood as a result of the resuscitation strategy and no morbidity was seen that could be attributed to the effect of giving blood. The total amount of blood received by comparable cohorts in the study period and the two preceding years were similar.
conclusionsThe study suggests that in the hip fracture population it is both practical and beneficial to move away from reactive transfusion regimens, and instead centre efforts instead on optimal resuscitation at the initial presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.