Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021042›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Large osteophyte removal from the posterior femoral condyle significantly improves extension at the time of surgery in a total knee arthroplasty.

Murilo Anderson Leie, Antonio Klasan, Takeshi Oshima, Sven Edwards Putnis, Wai Weng Yeo, Lincoln Luk, Myles Coolican

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Murilo Anderson LeieSydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Level 1 The Gallery, 445 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, New South Wales, 2067, Australia.
Antonio KlasanSydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Level 1 The Gallery, 445 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, New South Wales, 2067, Australia.
Takeshi OshimaSydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Level 1 The Gallery, 445 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, New South Wales, 2067, Australia.
Sven Edwards PutnisSydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Level 1 The Gallery, 445 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, New South Wales, 2067, Australia.
Wai Weng YeoUniversity of New South Wales Medicine, Wallace Wurth Building, 18 High St, Kensington, New South Wales, 2052, Australia.
Lincoln LukRoyal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, 6060, Australia.
Myles CoolicanSydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Level 1 The Gallery, 445 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, New South Wales, 2067, Australia.
Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute · AURoyal Perth Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Removing osteophytes from the posterior compartment of the femur eliminates the tenting effects on the joint capsule and consequently increases the extension gap in total knee arthroplasty. However, there is no clear association with the size of osteophytes removed and the potential degree of additional extension achieved at time of surgery.

aimsCorrelate the size of posterior osteophytes removed with the degree of extension gained intraoperatively in total knee arthroplasty and develop a radiological classification system to grade these osteophytes.

methodsPatients who underwent a TKA had pre and post operative sagittal radiographs assessed and classified according to 4 different categories of a proposed classification system. Knee extension was then assessed by a computer navigated system before incision and after implant insertion. Confounding factors were controlled and considered on the analysis. The study was done retrospectively.

results147 patients were included in the study. Ninety-three (63.2%) patients had osteophytes on the posterior aspect of the femur completely removed and fifty-four patients (36.8%) did not have radiological evidence of osteophytes on the posterior aspect of the femur. There was a positive and linear correlation (Pearson correlation 0.327, p .005) between osteophyte size and degree of extension corrected at time of surgery. On Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis, we found that small osteophytes (Grade 1) did not seem to affect the extension, while removing Grade 2 or Grade 3 osteophytes lead to a gain in extension of 2.7 and 4.5° respectively.

conclusionRemoving large osteophytes (Grade 2 and Grade 3) from the posterior femoral compartment can be used as an adjuvant strategy to ensure that intraoperative extension is optimal. However removing small osteophytes (Grade 1) should not be expected to affect extension at the time of surgery in TKA and could increase intra-operative time and morbidity.

Indexed as

ExtensionFlexion contractureOsteophyte removalPosterior osteophyteRange of movementTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID32021042
PMCPMC6994791
OpenAlexW2984019830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.