ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2020
Double-positive in triple-negative? How significant is basal cytokeratin expression in breast cancer?
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Keratin as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer Progression: An Evidence-Synthesizing Narrative Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Cytokeratin expression in breast cancer: from mechanisms, progression, diagnosis, and prognosis to therapeutic implications.Molecular & cellular oncology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBasal-like breast cancer has an unfavorable prognosis. Immunohistochemically, they are predominantly estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and CerbB2 receptor (HER2)-negative, show expression of Cytokeratins (CKs) 5/6, CK14, CK 17 and P-cadherin and are associated with germline BRCA1 mutations. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an easily available and relatively inexpensive technique that can detect this cancer subtype, and patients can benefit from aggressive management protocols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of CK 5/6 and CK14 in breast cancer and its correlation with age, tumor grade, tumor size, histomorphological pattern, nodal status, ER, PR, HER2/neu, and Ki-67 index.
methodsFifty treatment-naїve patients of breast carcinoma who underwent surgery constituted the study group. No core cut biopsy specimens were considered. Histopathological examination along with IHC was performed for CK5/6, CK14, ER, PR, HER2/neu, and Ki-67. Comparison between the expression of CK5/6 and CK14 with age, tumor size, tumor grade, histological subtype, nodal status, ER, PR, HER2/neu, and Ki-67 expression was performed using SPSS 20 version software.
resultsTwenty-six percent of cases showed expression of CK5/6 and CK14. CK5/6 and CK14 expression correlated strongly with ER/PR negativity, young age, and Ki-67 proliferative index greater than 15%. No significant association with HER2/neu negativity was demonstrated. Contrasting results were obtained between CK5/6 and CK14 expression with respect to tumor grade and lymph node status.
conclusionIHC can be used to identify patients with basal phenotype breast cancer with good sensitivity and specificity, and such patients can benefit from aggressive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.