Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020860›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2020

Comparison of antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the implementation of an on-site FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in an academic tertiary pediatric hospital: a retrospective observational study.

Alexandra Hagen, Anna Eichinger, Melanie Meyer-Buehn, Tilmann Schober, Johannes Huebner

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Panels and Syndromic Testing in Clinical Microbiology.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra HagenDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Anna EichingerDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Melanie Meyer-BuehnDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Tilmann SchoberDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Johannes HuebnerDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337, Munich, Germany. johannes.huebner@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1232-4646
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrompt initiation of empiric therapy is common practice in case of suspected meningitis or encephalitis. However, in children the most common pathogens are viruses that usually do not require and are not covered by the applied anti-infective treatment. Novel multiplex PCR (mPCR) panels provide rapid on-site diagnostic testing for a variety of pathogens. This study compared empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the introduction of an on-site FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (FA ME Panel).

methodsWe retrospectively compared data for empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage between pediatric patients with suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection receiving mPCR testing and a matched historical control group. Patients were matched by age and suspected CNS infection. We included all patients for whom empiric antibiotics and/or acyclovir were prescribed.

resultsEach study group consisted of 46 patients with 29 (63.0%) infants and 17 (37.0%) older children. A viral pathogen was diagnosed in 5/46 (10.9%) patients in the control group (all enteroviruses) and in 14/46 (30.4%) patients in the mPCR group (enterovirus n = 9; human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) n = 5), (p = 0.038)). Length of Therapy (LoT) and Days of Therapy (DoT) for antibiotics were significantly lower for infants (4.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.038 and 8.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.015, respectively). Acyclovir therapy was significantly shorter for both, infants and older children (3.0 vs. 1.0 day, p < 0.001 for both age groups).

conclusionThe findings of our study suggest that the introduction of a FA ME Panel into clinical routine procedures is associated with a significantly reduced LoT and DoT of empiric anti-infective treatment in children with suspected meningoencephalitis. The largest effect was observed in infants.

Indexed as

AcyclovirAnti-Bacterial AgentsEncephalitisMeningitisAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAcyclovirAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial stewardshipEncephalitisFilmArrayMeningitisMeningoencephalitismPCR

Identifiers

PMID32020860
PMCPMC7001287
OpenAlexW3004655768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.