Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020541›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2020

Inter- and intra-provincial variation in screen-detected breast cancer across five Canadian provinces: a CanIMPACT study.

Marcy Winget, Yan Yuan, Mary L McBride, Cynthia Kendell, Kathleen M Decker, Eva Grunfeld, Patti A Groome, Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care Along the Continuum (CanIMPACT)

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcy WingetDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Rd., Mail Code 5475, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. mwinget@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5893-280X
Yan YuanSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mary L McBrideCancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Cynthia KendellCancer Outcomes Research Program, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kathleen M DeckerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Eva GrunfeldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patti A GroomeDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care Along the Continuum (CanIMPACT)
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAQueen's University · CAStanford University · US

Funding

CIHR 128272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBreast cancer screening aims to identify cancers in early stages when prognosis is better and treatments less invasive. We describe inter- and intra-provincial variation in the percentage of screen-detected cases under publicly funded healthcare systems and factors related to having screen- vs non-screen-detected breast cancer across five Canadian provinces.

methodsWomen aged 40+ diagnosed with incident breast cancer from 2007 to 2012 in five Canadian provinces were identified from their respective provincial cancer registries. Standardized provincial datasets were created linking screening, health administrative, and claims data. Province-specific logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of demographic and healthcare utilization factors in each province with the odds of screen-detected cancer.

resultsThere was significant inter- and intra-provincial variation by age. Screen detection ranged from 42% to 52% in ages 50-69 but women aged 50-59 had approximately 4-8% lower screen detection than those aged 60-69 in all provinces. Screening associations with income quintile and rurality varied across provinces. Those least likely to be screen-detected within a province were consistently in the lowest income quintile; OR ranged from 0.62-0.89 relative to highest income quintile/urban patients aged 50-69. Lack of visits to primary care 30 months prior to diagnosis was also consistently associated with lower odds of screen detection (OR range, 0.37-0.76).

conclusionBreast cancer screen detection rates in the Canadian provinces examined are relatively high. Associations with income-rurality indicate a need for greater attention and/or targeted outreach to specific communities and/or provincial regions to improve access to breast cancer screening services intra-provincially.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedCanadaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedAdministrative data linkageBreast cancer screeningMulti-jurisdictionalScreen-detected cancer

Identifiers

PMID32020541
PMCPMC7501385
OpenAlexW3005010544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.