Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020489›Full record

SynthesisPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

Common Elements of Practice, Process and Implementation in Out-of-School-Time Academic Interventions for At-risk Children: a Systematic Review.

Thomas Engell, Benedicte Kirkøen, Karianne Thune Hammerstrøm, Hege Kornør, Kristine Horseng Ludvigsen, Kristine Amlund Hagen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas EngellRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway. te@r-bup.no.ORCID 0000-0001-9515-9732
Benedicte KirkøenRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Karianne Thune HammerstrømRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Hege KornørNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine Horseng LudvigsenRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine Amlund HagenNorwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development, Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic achievement is a strong preventive factor against marginalization. Children at risk of academic failure and drop out can benefit from out-of-school-time academic (OSTA) interventions. Wide-scaled implementation and sustainment of effective interventions remain a struggle across education, welfare, and health. The need for approaches to increase implementability, effectiveness, and efficiency of interventions is pressing. Advancements in the field of education and mental health suggest identifying and studying discrete elements that are common across interventions for the purpose of hypothesis generation, intervention optimization, design improvement, and implementation. This review identified OSTA interventions for primary school children at risk of academic failure. Common elements methodology was used to code practice elements (n = 62), process elements (n = 49), and implementation elements (n = 36) in 30 effective and six ineffective OSTA interventions in matrices. Based on frequency counts, common practice, process, and implementation elements across the interventions were identified, and given frequency count values (FV) reflecting how often elements were included in effective studies as opposed to in ineffective studies. The five common practice elements with the highest FVs were homework support, training in positive parental school involvement, positive reinforcement, structured tutoring, and psychoeducation. The most common process element was regular support to intervention receiver, and the most common implementation element was quality monitoring. Common combinations of elements were also identified and given FVs. Results from this review can inform efforts to design or optimize OSTA interventions, and inform education, implementation, and practice to improve academic achievement for children at risk.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessSchoolsStudentsTeachingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansAcademic interventionsChildren at riskCommon elementsImplementation elementsOSTA interventionsPractice elementsPrimary school childrenProcess elements

Identifiers

PMID32020489
PMCPMC7162823
OpenAlexW3005036359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.