ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2020
First-line bevacizumab contributes to survival improvement in glioblastoma patients complementary to temozolomide.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of carmustine wafers, followed by radiation, temozolomide, and bevacizumab therapy, for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with maximal resection.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Trial
- Review
- Review
- Supramaximal Resection Can Prolong the Survival of Patients with Cortical Glioblastoma: A Volumetric Study.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2023Article
- Induction of Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma and Ovarian Cancers by a New Pyrrole Tubulin Assembly Inhibitor.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- Galectins in Glioma: Current Roles in Cancer Progression and Future Directions for Improving Treatment.Cancers · 2021Review
- Volumetric study reveals the relationship between outcome and early radiographic response during bevacizumab-containing chemoradiotherapy for unresectable glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma).International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Elevated XRCC5 expression level can promote temozolomide resistance and predict poor prognosis in glioblastoma.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Clinical significance of CDKN2A homozygous deletion in combination with methylated MGMT status for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- New Immunotherapeutic Approaches for Glioblastoma.Journal of immunology research · 2021Review
- Reoperation for recurrent glioblastomas: What to expect?Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Present and Future of Anti-Glioblastoma Therapies: A Deep Look into Molecular Dependencies/Features.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFirst-line bevacizumab (BEV) is now available as a treatment option for glioblastoma patients with severe clinical conditions in Japan. However, the survival benefits remain controversial. To elucidate these potential survival benefits, we retrospectively analyzed survival in glioblastoma patients receiving BEV.
methodsWe analyzed survival in 120 patients with IDH-wild type glioblastoma treated from 2002 to 2018. Overall survival (OS) was assessed in three treatment era subgroups [pre-temozolomide (TMZ), TMZ, and TMZ-BEV], and the correlations of prognostic factors with survival were evaluated.
resultsAn improvement in survival was observed after BEV approval (median OS in the pre-TMZ, TMZ, and TMZ-BEV eras: 14.6, 14.9, and 22.1 months, respectively). A Cox proportional hazards model identified extent of resection and MGMT methylation status as significant prognostic factors in the TMZ era; however, these factors were not significant in the TMZ-BEV era. In subgroup analyses, patients with MGMT methylation had improved OS after TMZ introduction (pre-TMZ vs. TMZ, 18.5 vs. 28.1 months; P = 0.13), and those without MGMT methylation had significantly increased OS after BEV approval (TMZ vs. TMZ-BEV, 12.2 vs. 16.7 months; P = 0.04).
conclusionsOur findings imply that optional first-line administration of BEV can overcome the impact of conventional risk factors and prolong survival complementary to TMZ. The patient subgroups benefitting from TMZ and BEV did not seem to overlap, and stratification based on risk factors, including MGMT methylation status, might be effective for selecting patients in whom BEV should be preferentially used as a first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.