Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2020
Tumor treating fields plus temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a sub-group analysis of Korean patients in the EF-14 phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00916409 (A Prospective, Multi-center Trial of NovoTTF-100A Together With Temozolomide Compared to Temozolomide Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed GBM.), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-center Trial of NovoTTF-100A Together With Temozolomide Compared to Temozolomide Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed GBM.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of tumor treating fields on overall and progression-free survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields (TTF) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy only in the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Bone metastasis from glioblastoma: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Tumor treating fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a retrospective analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Mapping the global research landscape and innovations on elderly glioma: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Management and survival trends for diffuse gliomas diagnosed at a single neurooncology center in China during 2000 to 2020.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent advances in Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy for glioblastoma.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Revisiting the standards of cancer detection and therapy alongside their comparison to modern methods.World journal of methodology · 2024Review
- Theory and application of TTFields in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Review
- Treatment advances in high-grade gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Potential functions and therapeutic implications of glioma-resident mesenchymal stem cells.Cell biology and toxicology · 2023Review
- Meta-Analysis of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia and Tumor Treating Fields in the Treatment of Glioblastomas.Cancers · 2023Review
- Anti-cancer mechanisms of action of therapeutic alternating electric fields (tumor treating fields [TTFields]).Journal of molecular cell biology · 2022Review
- Review
- Multiple subtentorial metastasis in diffuse midline glioma receiving tumor treating fields: a case report and literature review.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a tumor electric field treatment system in a rat model of glioma.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2020Article
- Editorial: advances in neuro-oncology and clinical treatment-from ASNO 2019.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Impact of tumor-treating fields on the survival of Japanese patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumor treating fields (TTFields) are anti-mitotic, non-invasive loco-regional cancer therapy comprising low intensity, intermediate frequency alternating electric fields. TTFields plus Temozolomide (TTFields/TMZ) extended survival versus TMZ alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients in the EF-14 trial. We report on Korean newly diagnosed GBM patients who participated in the EF-14 trial.
methodsThirty-nine participants of the EF-14 trial were enrolled at 8 sites in South Korea. Patients (24 TTFields/TMZ; 14 TMZ alone) received: TTFields (200 kHz) for > 18 h/day; TMZ at 120-150 mg for 5 days per a 28 day cycle. Safety and efficacy were assessed.
resultsPatient baseline characteristics were balanced in the 2 arms and the mean age was 52.1 years, 66.7% were male with a mean KPS of 90. Safety incidence was comparable between the 2 arms. In the TTFields/TMZ arm, 30% suffered from skin irritation versus 52% in the entire study population. No TTFields-related serious adverse events were reported. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the TTFields/TMZ arm was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.2-12.2) versus 4.2 (95% CI 1.9-11.2) with TMZ alone (p = 0.67). Median overall survival was 27.2 months (95% CI 21-NA) with TTFields/TMZ versus 15.2 months (95% CI 7.5-24.1; HR 0.27, p = 0.01) with TMZ alone.
conclusionMedian OS and 1- and 2-year survival rates were higher with TTFields/TMZ and similar to the entire EF-14 population. About 30% of patients reported skin irritation, a lower rate than seen in the entire EF-14 population. These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of TTFields in Korean newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.