ArticleEuropean radiology2020
How to estimate effective dose for CT patients.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The development and application of a novel precise health management model for pulmonary nodules population: a prospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Automated Measurement of Effective Radiation Dose byTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Comparison of doses received from non-contrast enhanced brain CT examinations between two CT scanners.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Dose length product to effective dose coefficients in adults.European radiology · 2024Article
- Dose length product to effective dose coefficients in children.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.European radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
key points• Rehani et al provide important insight into the status quo of CT dose and call an urgent attention to the high-dose group receiving over 100 mSv. • It is crucial to clearly understand the calculation algorithm of effective dose behind the CT dose reporting systems and potential uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32020401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.