Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020351›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Early secondary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury: postoperative complications, long-term functional outcomes, and impact on quality of life.

M Barbosa, M Glavind-Kristensen, P Christensen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A UK wide survey of general surgeons' experience of the primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M BarbosaPelvic Floor Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. malopint@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-2977
M Glavind-KristensenPelvic Floor Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
P ChristensenPelvic Floor Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn early secondary repair of the anal sphincter may be necessary if primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) is complicated by wound rupture or severe infection. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcomes, morbidity, and impact on quality of life (QoL) following an early secondary repair of OASIS.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. All women having a secondary repair of the anal sphincter within 21 days of delivery from February 1991 to February 2017 were included (n = 51). Complications were assessed by reviewing medical records. The patient-reported outcomes were assessed in 2018 by questionnaires. Primary outcome was Wexner score and St. Mark's score. Impact on QoL was assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQLS).

resultsAfter a median follow-up time of 6.7 years (IQR 3.3-16.6), 34 women completed the questionnaire. The mean (SD) Wexner score was 5.2 ± 4.7 and the mean (SD) St. Mark's score was 6.8 ± 5.7. Women with a Wexner score ≥ 9 had a significantly lower QoL score in all domains of the FIQLS compared to women with a Wexner score < 9 (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were experienced by 37%. Ten women developed a fistula of which nine required surgical treatment.

conclusionsAn early secondary repair of the anal sphincter can be performed within 21 days of delivery with functional long-term outcomes comparable to those following a late sphincter repair. However, there is an imminent risk of complications, mainly fistulas, which should be taken into consideration when choosing the ideal timing of the repair.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceQuality of LifeAnal CanalDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAnal incontinenceEarly secondary sphincter repairFecal incontinenceOASISObstetric sphincter injuriesPelvic floor dysfunctionQuality of lifeSphincter repair

Identifiers

PMID32020351
OpenAlexW3004971030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.