Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020311›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Factors influencing time-dependent decannulation after pediatric tracheostomy according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

Patricia I Falla, Jens H Westhoff, Nikolaus Bosch, Philippe A Federspil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Speaking Valves on Tracheostomy Decannulation.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patricia I FallaDivision of Oncological ORL Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jens H WesthoffDepartment of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nikolaus BoschDivision of Oncological ORL Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philippe A FederspilDivision of Oncological ORL Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. federspil@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-0185
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to determine whether there were differences in decannulation rates and time to decannulation in children depending on the indication for tracheostomy, age, and maturity at birth. STUDY

designRetrospective chart review and prospective interview by questionnaire.

methodsThe medical records of 106 pediatric patients (age 0-18 years) tracheostomized between January 1 1999 and January 1 2019 were reviewed. Patients were divided into three different groups depending on the indication for tracheostomy: unsafe airway (37.7%), long-term respiratory dependence (50.9%), or bronchopulmonary toilet for aspirations (11.3%).

results40 patients were successfully decannulated. The time-dependent decannulation rate after 2 and 5 years was 28.3% and 40.5% for patients with an unsafe airway, 42.4% and 66.8% for patients with long-term respiratory dependence, and 41.7% and 70.8% for patients needing bronchopulmonary toilet, respectively. After 2 and 5 years, patients aged 0-12 months at the time of tracheostomy were decannulated in 13.1% and 50.2% of cases, 1-5-year-olds in 35.3% and 48.2% of cases, 6-10-year-olds in 70% and 70% of cases, and 11-18-year-olds in 66.6% and 66.6% of cases, respectively. However, in a multivariate analysis, prematurity was found to be the only significant unfavorable variable (p = 0.013). Maturely born patients had an odds ratio of 3.87 (95% CI 1.32-11.33) for successful decannulation. This effect was present only in the first 5 years of life.

conclusionFactors indicating problems with decannulation are an unsafe airway, a young age at the time of tracheostomy, and prematurity at birth.

Indexed as

Device RemovalTracheostomyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOdds RatioProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesComplicationsMortalityPediatricTracheostomyTracheostomy decannulation

Identifiers

PMID32020311
OpenAlexW3005012419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.