Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020256›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2020

Specific T-cell immune responses against colony-forming cells including leukemic progenitor cells of AML patients were increased by immune checkpoint inhibition.

Jochen Greiner, Marlies Götz, Susanne Hofmann, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Markus Wiesneth, Lars Bullinger, Hartmut Döhner, Vanessa Schneider

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Bone marrow immune cells and drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jochen GreinerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 10, 89081, Ulm, Germany. greiner@diak-stuttgart.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1256-173X
Marlies GötzDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 10, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Susanne HofmannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 10, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Hubert SchrezenmeierInstitute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, German Red Cross Blood Donation Service Baden-Württemberg - Hessia, Ulm, Germany.
Markus WiesnethInstitute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, German Red Cross Blood Donation Service Baden-Württemberg - Hessia, Ulm, Germany.
Lars BullingerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 10, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Hartmut DöhnerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 10, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Vanessa SchneiderDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 10, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEGerman Red Cross · DE

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb CA184-397Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1074 project B3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of immunotherapies in cancer treatment becomes more and more apparent not only in different solid tumors but also in hematological malignancies. However, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), mechanisms to increase the efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches have to be further elucidated. Targeting leukemic progenitor and stem cells (LPC/LSC) by specific CTL, for instance, in an adjuvant setting or in minimal residual disease, might be an option to prevent relapse of AML or to treat MRD. Therefore, we investigated the influence of immune checkpoint inhibitors on LAA-specific immune responses by CTL against leukemic myeloid blasts and colony-forming cells including leukemic progenitor cells (CFC/LPC). In functional immunoassays like CFU/CFI (colony-forming units/immunoassays) and ELISpot analysis, we detected specific LAA-directed immune responses against CFC/LPC that are postulated to be the source population of relapse of the disease. The addition of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) significantly increases LAA-directed immune responses against CFC/LPC, no effect is seen when ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) is added. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab does not improve the effect compared to nivolumab alone. The anti-PD1-directed immune response correlates to PD-L1 expression on progenitor cells. Our data suggest that immunotherapeutic approaches have the potential to target malignant CFC/LPC and anti-PD-1 antibodies could be an immunotherapeutic approach in AML. Moreover, combination with LAA-directed vaccination strategies might also open interesting application possibilities.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenCTLA-4 AntigenHumansImmunotherapyIpilimumabLeukemia, MyeloidNeoplastic Stem CellsNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTreatment OutcomeB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanCTLA-4 AntigenIpilimumabNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAcute myeloid leukemia (AML)Colony-forming cells including leukemic progenitor cells (CFC/LPC)Colony-forming immunoassays (CFI)Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) responsesImmune checkpoint inhibition (ICI)Leukemia-associated antigens (LAA)

Identifiers

PMID32020256
PMCPMC11027801
OpenAlexW3005524919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.