ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2020
[Testicular tumors in prepubertal boys-organ preservation possible more often than expected].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Juvenile granulosa cell tumor-Testicular tumor of the very young : Report of three cases and contemporary recommendations].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In prepubertal boys, testicular tumors are rare with an incidence between 2 and 5/million. In contrast to testicular tumors in adolescents and adults, more than 2/3 of these tumors are benign. Unfortunately, in Germany in most cases, only malignant tumors (usually yolk sac tumors) are reported to the study center (MAKEI IV and now V). Therefore, the incidence in Germany is unknown. Since the introduction of polychemotherapy in the 1970s, the prognosis of malignant testicular tumors has improved enormously and has become a curable disease, even in the case of recurrence. Today the orchiectomy, which was usually carried out in the past, appears to be no longer justified in most prepubertal boys due to the high incidence of benign tumors. It has been shown in various studies that organ-sparing surgery in germ cell tumors (epidermoid cysts, teratoma); gonadal stoma tumors (Sertoli, Leydig and granulosa cell tumors) and cystic lesions (intratesticular cysts and tubular ectasia of the rete testis) is reliable and safe. In cases with preoperative significantly increased AFP (caution: norm values not valid in the first year of life) and a clear testicular tumor in the ultrasound (yolk sac tumor) or if no testicular parenchyma is sonographically detectable, orchiectomy can still be carried out. Today orchiectomies in prepubertal boys should be an exception and the reasons for an orchiectomy must be well documented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.