Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020204›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Exo1 phosphorylation inhibits exonuclease activity and prevents fork collapse in rad53 mutants independently of the 14-3-3 proteins.

Esther C Morafraile, Alberto Bugallo, Raquel Carreira, María Fernández, Cristina Martín-Castellanos, Miguel G Blanco, Mónica Segurado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Esther C MorafraileInstituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (CSIC/USAL), Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Alberto BugalloInstituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (CSIC/USAL), Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Raquel CarreiraDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS) - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María FernándezInstituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (CSIC/USAL), Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Cristina Martín-CastellanosInstituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (CSIC/USAL), Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Miguel G BlancoDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS) - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Mónica SeguradoInstituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica (CSIC/USAL), Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Instituto de Biología Funcional y Genómica · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The S phase checkpoint is crucial to maintain genome stability under conditions that threaten DNA replication. One of its critical functions is to prevent Exo1-dependent fork degradation, and Exo1 is phosphorylated in response to different genotoxic agents. Exo1 seemed to be regulated by several post-translational modifications in the presence of replicative stress, but the specific contribution of checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation to Exo1 control and fork stability is not clear. We show here that Exo1 phosphorylation is Dun1-independent and Rad53-dependent in response to DNA damage or dNTP depletion, and in both situations Exo1 is similarly phosphorylated at multiple sites. To investigate the correlation between Exo1 phosphorylation and fork stability, we have generated phospho-mimic exo1 alleles that rescue fork collapse in rad53 mutants as efficiently as exo1-nuclease dead mutants or the absence of Exo1, arguing that Rad53-dependent phosphorylation is the mayor requirement to preserve fork stability. We have also shown that this rescue is Bmh1-2 independent, arguing that the 14-3-3 proteins are dispensable for fork stabilization, at least when Exo1 is downregulated. Importantly, our results indicated that phosphorylation specifically inhibits the 5' to 3'exo-nuclease activity, suggesting that this activity of Exo1 and not the flap-endonuclease, is the enzymatic activity responsible of the collapse of stalled replication forks in checkpoint mutants.

Indexed as

14-3-3 ProteinsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationExodeoxyribonucleasesGenome, FungalGenomic InstabilityPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints14-3-3 ProteinsBMH1 protein, S cerevisiaeBMH2 protein, S cerevisiaeCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DUN1 protein, S cerevisiaeexodeoxyribonuclease IExodeoxyribonucleasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32020204
PMCPMC7102976
OpenAlexW3006567221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.