ArticleSaudi medical journal2020
The use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in a tertiary pediatric hospital.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prescribing Practices of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Tertiary Care Hospitals in Malaysia: A Need for a National Guideline for Immunoglobulin Use.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine demographic features of patients provided intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) excluding replacement therapy in the inpatient services and to evaluate indications for IVIG, and side effects related to therapy. Methods: Patients who received IVIG therapy between January 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively identified. The demographic features, diagnosis, IVIG dose, number of days they underwent IVIG therapy, and whether or not they experienced IVIG-related side effects were recorded. Results: A total of 186 patients were included in this study, and of these, 89 (47.8%) were females. The median age of all of the patients was 48.5 months old (range 13-120 months). When the IVIG indications were examined, the hematological disease group had the highest number of patients (n=73, 39.2%). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeled use rate was 45.7%. Side effects were seen in 15 (3.81%) of the 394 IVIG infusions, 2 of which were acute kidney failure and nausea/vomiting as delayed onset side effects. The rapid onset side effects included fever (n=5), headache (n=3), rash and redness (n=2), and pain in the infusion area, hypotension, and hypertension (n=1). Conclusion: Intravenous immunoglobulin preparations are used for the treatment of many diseases due to their immunoregulatory effects. In recent years, the use of IVIGs without FDA approval has been increasing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.