Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020043›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Methylene blue administration in patients with refractory distributive shock - a retrospective study.

Michal Porizka, Petr Kopecky, Helena Dvorakova, Jan Kunstyr, Michal Lips, Pavel Michalek, Martin Balik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epineural Methylene Blue Injection May Aid Localization of Digital Nerves in Dupuytren's Surgery.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michal PorizkaGeneral University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. michal.porizka@vfn.cz.
Petr KopeckyGeneral University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Helena DvorakovaGeneral University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan KunstyrGeneral University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal LipsGeneral University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel MichalekGeneral University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin BalikGeneral University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodynamic effectiveness of methylene blue (MB) was tested in patients with refractory distributive shock. A retrospective analysis of 20 critically-ill patients who developed refractory shock was performed. Patients were divided into two study groups as responders with positive hemodynamic response to MB administration (defined as 10% decrease of norepinephrine dose) and non-responders. Hemodynamic, outcome data and baseline tissue hypoxia-related parameters including ratio of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension to arterio-venous oxygen content (P(v-a)CO

Indexed as

AgedBlood PressureFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMethylene BlueMiddle AgedNorepinephrineOxygenRetrospective StudiesShockSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeVasoconstrictor AgentsMethylene BlueNorepinephrineOxygenVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID32020043
PMCPMC7000741
OpenAlexW3004457251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.