Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020025›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The upper cervical spinal cord in ALS assessed by cross-sectional and longitudinal 3T MRI.

Thomas Wimmer, Frank Schreiber, Nathalie Hensiek, Cornelia Garz, Jörn Kaufmann, Judith Machts, Susanne Vogt, Johannes Prudlo, Reinhard Dengler, Susanne Petri and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spinal nerves as landmarks for spinal cord segment delineation: cervical cross-sectional area measurement in healthy subjects.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas WimmerDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-7927
Frank SchreiberDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-8613
Nathalie HensiekDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Cornelia GarzDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jörn KaufmannDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Judith MachtsDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-095X
Susanne VogtDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-3516
Johannes PrudloDepartment of Neurology, University Medical School Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Reinhard DenglerDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3715-6100
Susanne PetriDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9783-8584
Hans-Jochen HeinzeDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Peter J NestorQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5860-5921
Stefan VielhaberDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefanie SchreiberDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. stefanie.schreiber@med.ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-4374
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The upper cervical spinal cord is measured in a large longitudinal amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cohort to evaluate its role as a biomarker. Specifically, the cervical spinal cord´s cross-sectional area (CSA) in plane of the segments C1-C3 was measured semi-automatically with T1-weighted 3T MRI sequences in 158 ALS patients and 86 controls. Six-month longitudinal follow-up MRI scans were analyzed in 103 patients. Compared to controls, in ALS there was a significant mean spinal cord atrophy (63.8 mm² vs. 60.8 mm², p = 0.001) which showed a trend towards worsening over time (mean spinal cord CSA decrease from 61.4 mm² to 60.6 mm² after 6 months, p = 0.06). Findings were most pronounced in the caudal segments of the upper cervical spinal cord and in limb-onset ALS. Baseline CSA was related to the revised ALS functional rating scale, disease duration, precentral gyrus thickness and total brain gray matter volume. In conclusion, spinal cord atrophy as assessed in brain MRIs in ALS patients mirrors the extent of overall neurodegeneration and parallels disease severity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAtrophyCervical CordDisease ProgressionFemaleGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32020025
PMCPMC7000761
OpenAlexW3004624483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.