Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020021›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Functional lateralization of arithmetic processing in the intraparietal sulcus is associated with handedness.

Christina Artemenko, Maria A Sitnikova, Mojtaba Soltanlou, Thomas Dresler, Hans-Christoph Nuerk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina Artemenko *Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. christina.artemenko@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-7960
Maria A Sitnikova *Department of Psychology, Pedagogical Institute, Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia.
Mojtaba SoltanlouDepartment of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Thomas DreslerLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph NuerkDepartment of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional lateralization is established for various cognitive functions, but was hardly ever investigated for arithmetic processing. Most neurocognitive models assume a central role of the bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in arithmetic processing and there is some evidence for more pronounced left-hemispheric activation for symbolic arithmetic. However, evidence was mainly obtained by studies in right-handers. Therefore, we conducted a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study, in which IPS activation of left-handed adults was compared to right-handed adults in a symbolic approximate calculation task. The results showed that left-handers had a stronger functional right-lateralization in the IPS than right-handers. This finding has important consequences, as the bilateral IPS activation pattern for arithmetic processing seems to be shaped by functional lateralization and thus differs between left- and right-handers. We propose three possible accounts for the observed functional lateralization of arithmetic processing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleFunctional LateralityFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMaleMathematicsParietal LobeProblem SolvingReaction TimeSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32020021
PMCPMC7000739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.