Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019918›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

The megabiota are disproportionately important for biosphere functioning.

Brian J Enquist, Andrew J Abraham, Michael B J Harfoot, Yadvinder Malhi, Christopher E Doughty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sodium Retention in Large Herbivores: Physiological Insights and Zoogeochemical Consequences.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The need for carbon finance schemes to tackle overexploitation of tropical forest wildlife.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reference genome of the leopard seal (Frontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Survey-based inference of continental African elephant decline.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Future changes in society and climate may strongly shape wild large-herbivore faunas across Europe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian J EnquistDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Arizona, AZ 85721, USA. benquist@email.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7096
Andrew J AbrahamSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-8851
Michael B J HarfootUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK.
Yadvinder MalhiEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-4783
Christopher E DoughtySchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prominent signal of the Anthropocene is the extinction and population reduction of the megabiota-the largest animals and plants on the planet. However, we lack a predictive framework for the sensitivity of megabiota during times of rapid global change and how they impact the functioning of ecosystems and the biosphere. Here, we extend metabolic scaling theory and use global simulation models to demonstrate that (i) megabiota are more prone to extinction due to human land use, hunting, and climate change; (ii) loss of megabiota has a negative impact on ecosystem metabolism and functioning; and (iii) their reduction has and will continue to significantly decrease biosphere functioning. Global simulations show that continued loss of large animals alone could lead to a 44%, 18% and 92% reduction in terrestrial heterotrophic biomass, metabolism, and fertility respectively. Our findings suggest that policies that emphasize the promotion of large trees and animals will have disproportionate impact on biodiversity, ecosystem processes, and climate mitigation.

Indexed as

BiotaAnimalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansPlantsPopulation DynamicsTrees

Identifiers

PMID32019918
PMCPMC7000713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.