Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019830›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Temporal Dynamics of Memory-guided Cognitive Control and Generalization of Control via Overlapping Associative Memories.

Jiefeng Jiang, Inês Bramão, Anna Khazenzon, Shao-Fang Wang, Mikael Johansson, Anthony D Wagner

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Learning to Overexert Cognitive Control in a Stroop Task.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiefeng JiangDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, jiefeng.jiang@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4264-6382
Inês BramãoDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, SE-221 00, and.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-2381
Anna KhazenzonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Shao-Fang WangDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Mikael JohanssonDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, SE-221 00, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-6301
Anthony D WagnerDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-0624-4543

Funding

Age-related decline in interactions between context, cognitive control, and memoryR21AG058111 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WAGNER, ANTHONY D · 2018 to 2019
$432k
Neurocognitive mechanisms of age-related declines in context-driven adjustments of cognitive controlF32AG056080 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, JIEFENG · 2017 to 2019
$170k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG056080NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior can benefit from proactive adjustments of cognitive control that occur in anticipation of forthcoming cognitive control demands (CCD). Predictions of forthcoming CCD are thought to depend on learning and memory in two ways: First, through direct experience, associative encoding may link previously experienced CCD to its triggering item, such that subsequent encounters with the item serve to cue retrieval of (i.e., predict) the associated CCD. Second, in the absence of direct experience, pattern completion and mnemonic integration mechanisms may allow CCD to be generalized from its associated item to other items related in memory. While extant behavioral evidence documents both types of CCD prediction, the neurocognitive mechanisms giving rise to these predictions remain largely unexplored. Here, we tested two hypotheses: (1) memory-guided predictions about CCD precede control adjustments due to the actual CCD required; and (2) generalization of CCD can be accomplished through integration mechanisms that link partially overlapping CCD-item and item-item associations in memory. Supporting these hypotheses, the temporal dynamics of theta and alpha power in human electroencephalography data (

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAlpha RhythmAssociation LearningBrain MappingCognitionCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMemoryPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Timeassociative memorycognitive controlEEGgeneralization

Identifiers

PMID32019830
PMCPMC7083282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.