Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019791›Full record

ArticlemBio2020

Influence of Plant Fraction, Soil, and Plant Species on Microbiota: a Multikingdom Comparison.

Andrzej Tkacz, Eloïne Bestion, Zhiyan Bo, Marion Hortala, Philip S Poole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unlocking the power ofmSystems · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Non-nodulatingISME communications · 2026
    Article
  9. Rhizosphere and fruit microbiome variation acrossFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrzej TkaczDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom andrzej.tkacz@plants.ox.ac.uk philip.poole@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0701-8946
Eloïne Bestion *Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Zhiyan Bo *Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marion Hortala *Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Philip S PooleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom andrzej.tkacz@plants.ox.ac.uk philip.poole@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-6455

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N013387/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R017859/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant roots influence the soil microbiota via physical interaction, secretion, and plant immunity. However, it is unclear whether the root fraction or soil is more important in determining the structure of the prokaryotic or eukaryotic community and whether this varies between plant species. Furthermore, the leaf (phyllosphere) and root microbiotas have a large overlap; however, it is unclear whether this results from colonization of the phyllosphere by the root microbiota. Soil, rhizosphere, rhizoplane, and root endosphere prokaryote-, eukaryote-, and fungus-specific microbiotas of four plant species were analyzed with high-throughput sequencing. The strengths of factors controlling microbiota structure were determined using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) statistics. The origin of the phyllosphere microbiota was investigated using a soil swap experiment. Global microbial kingdom analysis conducted simultaneously on multiple plants shows that cereals, legumes, and Brassicaceae establish similar prokaryotic and similar eukaryotic communities inside and on the root surface. While the bacterial microbiota is recruited from the surrounding soil, its profile is influenced by the root itself more so than by soil or plant species. However, in contrast, the fungal microbiota is most strongly influenced by soil. This was observed in two different soils and for all plant species examined. Microbiota structure is established within 2 weeks of plant growth in soil and remains stable thereafter. A reciprocal soil swap experiment shows that the phyllosphere is colonized from the soil in which the plant is grown.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaFungiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlantsRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Scolonization dynamicsmicrobial colonizationmicrobial ecologyphyllosphereplant-microbe interactionsplant microbiotarhizosphererhizosphere-inhabiting microbesrootssoil microbiologyStachybotrys infection

Identifiers

PMID32019791
PMCPMC7002342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.