Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019774›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2020

Experiences of GP trainees in undertaking telephone consultations: a mixed-methods study.

Umar Chaudhry, Judith Ibison, Tess Harris, Imran Rafi, Miles Johnston, Tim Fawns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Gut feeling is changing in the post-coronavirus world.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  14. General Practitioners' Experience of Remote Consultations by Telephone in the General Practice Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Umar ChaudhryClinical Teaching Fellow, Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), St George's University of London (SGUL), London, UK uchaudhr@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2618-9257
Judith IbisonReader in Primary Care, Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education (IMBE), St George's University of London (SGUL), London, UK.
Tess HarrisProfessor of Primary Care Research, Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), St George's University of London (SGUL), London, UK.
Imran RafiSenior Lecturer in Primary Care Education, Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education (IMBE), St George's University of London (SGUL), London, UK.
Miles JohnstonGeneral Practitioner, Parliament Hill Medical Centre, London, UK.
Tim FawnsLecturer in Clinical Education, Medical Education Department, Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care telephone consultations are increasingly used for patient triage, reviews, and providing clinical information. They are also a key postgraduate training component yet little is known about GP trainees' preparation for, or experiences and perceptions of, them.

aimTo understand the experiences, perceptions, and training of GP trainees in conducting telephone consultations. DESIGN &

settingA mixed-methods study was undertaken of North Central and East London (NCEL) GP trainees.

methodA cross-sectional electronic survey of trainees was performed with subsequent semi-structured interviews. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data using thematic analysis.

resultsThe survey response was 16% (

conclusionThis project sheds light on GP trainees' current experiences of telephone consultations and the need to enhance future training. The findings will inform a wider debate among stakeholders and postgraduate learners regarding training for telephone consultations, and potentially for other remote technologies.

Indexed as

educationgeneral practicequalitative researchquantitative evaluationremote consultationtelephone consultations

Identifiers

PMID32019774
PMCPMC7330189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.