Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019619›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2020

Generating value with mental health apps.

Adam C Powell, John B Torous, Joseph Firth, Kenneth R Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role and reach of alcohol reduction apps.Health affairs scholar · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mental health apps within the healthcare system: associations with stigma and mental health literacy.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Healthcare Workers' Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam C PowellPresident, Payer+Provider Syndicate, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-3120
John B TorousDirector, Digital Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-7937
Joseph FirthSenior Research Fellow, NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Australia; and Honorary Research Fellow, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Kenneth R KaufmanProfessor of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Anaesthesiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, USA; and Visiting Professor of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough apps are increasingly being used to support the diagnosis, treatment and management of mental illness, there is no single means through which costs associated with mental apps are being reimbursed. Furthermore, different apps are amenable to different means of reimbursement as not all apps generate value in the same way.

aimsTo provide insights into how apps are currently generating value and being reimbursed across the world, with a particular focus on the situation in the USA.

methodAn international team performed secondary research on how apps are being used and on common pathways to remuneration.

resultsThe uses of apps today and in the future are reviewed, the nature of the value delivered by apps is summarised and an overview of app reimbursement in the USA and other countries is provided. Recommendations regarding how payments might be made for apps in the future are discussed.

conclusionsCurrently, apps are being reimbursed through channels with other original purposes. There may be a need to develop an app-specific channel for reimbursement which is analogous to the channels used for devices, drugs and laboratory tests.

Indexed as

appsdigitalHealth insurancemanaged caremHealthmobile healthsmartphonesvalue

Identifiers

PMID32019619
PMCPMC7176837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.