Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019499›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women's experiences.

J F M van den Heuvel, C J Teunis, A Franx, N M T H Crombag, M N Bekker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05778435 (The Effect Of The Wireless Fetal Monitoring Used During Birth On The Women's Comfort, Labour Pain And Birth Satisfaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05778435 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of The Wireless Fetal Monitoring Used During Birth On The Women's Comfort, Labour Pain And Birth Satisfaction

TypeinterventionalSponsorTokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled88ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmswireless fetal monitoring system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What Do Mothers Want during a High-risk Pregnancy? A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J F M van den HeuvelDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Ref: KE 04.123.1 Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C J TeunisDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Ref: KE 04.123.1 Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A FranxDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Ref: KE 04.123.1 Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N M T H CrombagDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Ref: KE 04.123.1 Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M N BekkerDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Ref: KE 04.123.1 Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.n.bekker-3@umcutrecht.nl.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Stichting Achmea Gezondsheidszorg R3679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital admission during pregnancy complications is considered to be an event of significant impact. Besides conventional in-clinic maternal and fetal monitoring, recent technologies enable home-based telemonitoring with self-measurements in high risk pregnancy. This study is part of a feasibility pilot to explore the usability and acceptability of telemonitoring and aims to gain insight in the experiences and preferences of high risk pregnant women concerning the novel strategy of telemonitoring, opposed to women who were hospitalized in pregnancy.

methodsUsing secured Facebook Groups, we conducted four online focus groups: two focus groups with women who were admitted during pregnancy (n = 11) and two with women who received home telemonitoring in the pilot phase (n = 11). The qualitative data were analyzed thematically.

resultsFour major themes emerged from both participant groups: [1] care experience, [2] emotions regarding pregnancy, [3] privacy and [4] impact on daily life. Different views were reported on all four themes, resulting in a direct comparison of experiences during hospitalization and telemonitoring. Most admitted patients reported a growing sense of boredom and anxiety during their clinical admission. Lack of privacy on ward was a great concern, as it affected their contact with hospital staff and family. This issue was not reported amongst telemonitored women. These participants still felt like a patient at times but responded that the comfort of their own home and bed was pleasant. Only a minority of telemonitored participants reported being anxious at times at home, while not having a physician or nurse nearby. Being at home resulted in less travel time for partners or family for hospital visits, which had its positive effects on family life.

conclusionsTelemonitoring of a high-risk pregnancy provides an innovative manner to monitor fetal and maternal condition from home. Compared to the experiences of hospital admission in high risk pregnancy, it allows women to be in a comforting and private environment during an anxious time in their lives. As future studies should further investigate the safety and cost effectiveness of this novel strategy, women's views on the preference of telemonitoring need to be taken into consideration.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFetal MonitoringFocus GroupsHumansInternetPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchTelemedicineFetal monitoringHigh risk pregnancyPatient centered carePerinatal carePregnancy complicationsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32019499
PMCPMC7001237
OpenAlexW3008892677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.