Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019244›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

A Comparison of Osteoblast and Osteoclast In Vitro Co-Culture Models and Their Translation for Preclinical Drug Testing Applications.

Alexander Sieberath, Elena Della Bella, Ana Marina Ferreira, Piergiorgio Gentile, David Eglin, Kenny Dalgarno

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Bone Loss in Diabetes Mellitus: Diaporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of Loganin on Bone Formation and Resorption In Vitro and In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander SieberathSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-4164
Elena Della BellaAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5151-7390
Ana Marina FerreiraSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-1619
Piergiorgio GentileSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3036-6594
David EglinAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8500-6887
Kenny DalgarnoSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4522-8044
Newcastle University · GBAO Foundation · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the population of western societies on average ages, the number of people affected by bone remodeling-associated diseases such as osteoporosis continues to increase. The development of new therapeutics is hampered by the high failure rates of drug candidates during clinical testing, which is in part due to the poor predictive character of animal models during preclinical drug testing. Co-culture models of osteoblasts and osteoclasts offer an alternative to animal testing and are considered to have the potential to improve drug development processes in the future. However, a robust, scalable, and reproducible 3D model combining osteoblasts and osteoclasts for preclinical drug testing purposes has not been developed to date. Here we review various types of osteoblast-osteoclast co-culture models and outline the remaining obstacles that must be overcome for their successful translation.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalAnimalsBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingCoculture TechniquesHumansOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteoporosisBone Density Conservation Agentsco-culturedrug testingin vitro modelosteoblastosteoclastosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID32019244
PMCPMC7037207
OpenAlexW3003242139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.