Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32019042›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2020

Field testing of a household-scale onsite blackwater treatment system in Coimbatore, India.

Claire M Welling, Sarani Sasidaran, Prateek Kachoria, Sarah Hennessy, Brendon J Lynch, Stephanie Teleski, Hitendra Chaudhari, Katelyn L Sellgren, Brian R Stoner, Sonia Grego and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Technologies for pollutant removal and resource recovery from blackwater: a review.Frontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire M WellingDuke University Center for WaSH-AID and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.
Sarani SasidaranRTI India, New Delhi 110 092, India.
Prateek KachoriaRTI India, New Delhi 110 092, India.
Sarah HennessyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Triangle Environmental Health Initiative, Durham, NC, USA.
Brendon J LynchBiomass Controls, PBC, Durham, NC, USA.
Stephanie TeleskiBiomass Controls, PBC, Durham, NC, USA.
Hitendra ChaudhariBiomass Controls, PBC, Durham, NC, USA.
Katelyn L SellgrenDuke University Center for WaSH-AID and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.
Brian R StonerDuke University Center for WaSH-AID and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.
Sonia GregoDuke University Center for WaSH-AID and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.
Brian T HawkinsDuke University Center for WaSH-AID and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: brian.hawkins@duke.edu.
Duke University · USBiomass Controls · USGujarat Matikam Kalakari & Rural Technology Institute · INRTI International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

4.2 billion people live without access to safely managed sanitation services. This report describes the field testing of an onsite prototype system designed to treat blackwater from a single flush toilet and reuse of the treated effluent for flushing. The system passes wastewater through a solid-liquid separator followed by settling tanks and granular activated carbon columns into an electrochemical reactor that oxidizes chloride salts from urine to generate chlorine to remove pathogens. The objectives of the study were to verify the functionality of the system (previously demonstrated in the laboratory) under realistic use conditions, to identify maintenance requirements, and to make a preliminary assessment of the system's user acceptability. The prototype was installed in a women's workplace and residential toilet block in Coimbatore, India, and tested over a period of 10 months. The treated water met stringent disinfection threshold for both E. coli and helminth eggs and produced a clear, colorless effluent that met or nearly met local and international discharge standards for non-sewered sanitation systems. The effluent had an average chemical oxygen demand of 81 mg/L, total suspended solids of 11 mg/L, and reduction of total nitrogen by 65%. These tests determined the recommended service lifetimes and maintenance intervals for key system components including the electrochemical cell, granular activated carbon columns, and solid-liquid separator. User feedback regarding the use of treated blackwater as flush water was positive. These findings will inform the design and implementation of next-generation systems currently under development.

Indexed as

Blackwater reuseOnsite sanitationTamil NaduUser testingWASH

Identifiers

PMID32019042
PMCPMC7043008
OpenAlexW2998924942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.