Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32018131›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical anesthesia2020

Rapid in-person cognitive screening in the preoperative setting: Test considerations and recommendations from the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI).

Franchesca Arias, Margaret Wiggins, Richard D Urman, Rebecca Armstrong, Kurt Pfeifer, Angela M Bader, David J Libon, Anita Chopra, Catherine C Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The New Frontier of Perioperative Cognitive Medicine for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Franchesca AriasPain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence (PRICE), 101 S. Newell Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States of America; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, The University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, United States of America; Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN), UF Health Shands Hospital, 1600 SW Archer Road Suite 1111, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States of America. Electronic address: franchescaarias@hsl.harvard.edu.
Margaret WigginsDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, The University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, United States of America; Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN), UF Health Shands Hospital, 1600 SW Archer Road Suite 1111, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States of America. Electronic address: ellewiggins@phhp.ufl.edu.
Richard D UrmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America. Electronic address: rurman@bwh.harvard.edu.
Rebecca ArmstrongDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, The University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, United States of America; Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN), UF Health Shands Hospital, 1600 SW Archer Road Suite 1111, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States of America. Electronic address: r.armstrong@phhp.ufl.edu.
Kurt PfeiferDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States of America. Electronic address: kpfeifer@mcw.edu.
Angela M BaderDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America. Electronic address: abader@bwh.harvard.edu.
David J LibonDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Psychology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, School of Osteopathic Medicine, Rowan University, Stratford, NJ 08084, United States of America. Electronic address: libon@rowan.edu.
Anita ChopraDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Psychology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, School of Osteopathic Medicine, Rowan University, Stratford, NJ 08084, United States of America. Electronic address: chopraan@rowan.edu.
Catherine C PricePain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence (PRICE), 101 S. Newell Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States of America; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, The University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32603, United States of America; Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN), UF Health Shands Hospital, 1600 SW Archer Road Suite 1111, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States of America; Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States of America. Electronic address: cep23@phhp.ufl.edu.

Funding

PRECEDE: PREsurgical Cognitive Evaluation via Digital clockfacEdrawingR01AG055337 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CATHERINE E PRICE, Parisa Rashidi · 2017 to 2026
$3.2M
Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Post-Operative Cognitive Decline in Older AdultsR01NR014181 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PRICE, CATHERINE E · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Perioperative Cognitive Anesthesia Network (PeCAN) Program for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related DementiasK07AG066813 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PRICE, CATHERINE E · 2020 to 2024
$810k
NIA NIH HHS K07 AG066813NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055337NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are few cognitive screening tools appropriate for fast-paced settings with limited staffing, and particularly in preoperative evaluation clinics. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) convened experts in neuropsychology, geriatric medicine, and anesthesiology to conduct a review of the literature and compile a comprehensive list of cognitive screening tools used within primary care and preoperative settings. This Recommendations Statement: 1. summarizes a review of the literature on existing cognitive screening tools used within preoperative settings; 2. discusses factors to consider when selecting cognitive screening tools in a preoperative environment; and 3. includes a work flow diagram to guide use of these screening measures. Methodology involved searching peer-reviewed literature for 29 cognitive screening tools which were identified from the literature that fit inclusion criteria. Of these 29, seven tests have been used in preoperative settings and are discussed. These seven had an average administration time ranging from one to ten minutes. Memory, language, and attention were the most commonly evaluated cognitive domains. Most had adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect cognitive impairment/dementia. While information on the psychometric properties of these tools is limited, the tools discussed are appropriate for lay examiners, are short in duration, and accessible for free or at a low cost. We describe factors that must be considered prior to instrument selection.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionQuality ImprovementAgedCognitionHumansMass ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificityAssessmentCognitiveDementiaImpairmentInstrumentsPreoperativeScreening, deliriumTools

Identifiers

PMID32018131
PMCPMC8402420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.