ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2020
A randomized, controlled trial of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to treat overactive bladder and neurogenic bladder patients.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The importance of electrical parameters on transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2025Pooled it
- Tibial nerve stimulation compared with sham to reduce incontinence in care home residents: ELECTRIC RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Trial
- Clinical Outcomes of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation: Face-to-Face Versus Telehealth Tuition.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Effect of a novel implantable tibial nerve stimulation system on overactive bladder in pigs.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Urology research & practice · 2023Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of bladder storage symptoms among people with multiple sclerosis.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Percutaneous versus Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Posterior Tibial Nerve in Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome with Urinary Incontinence in Adults: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Superficial peroneal neuromodulation of persistent bladder underactivity induced by prolonged pudendal afferent nerve stimulation in cats.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to determine if transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is effective at treating overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms among neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients.
methodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Adult patients were recruited from one of two groups: 1) women with OAB; and 2) patients with neurogenic disease and bladder symptoms. The intervention was stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve, for 30 minutes, three times per week for 12 weeks at home using transcutaneous patch electrodes. The primary outcome was improvement of the patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC). We used ANCOVA (with adjustment for baseline values) and followed the intention-to-treat principle; we reported marginal means (MM) and a p<0.05 was considered significant.
resultsWe recruited 50 patients (OAB n=20, neurogenic bladder n=30); 24 were allocated to the sham group and 26 to the active TTNS group. Baseline characteristics in both groups were similar. At the end of the study, there was no significant difference in the PPBC between sham or active groups: 13% (3/24) of sham patients and 15% (4/26) of active TTNS patients were responders (p=0.77), and the MM of the end-of-study PPBC score was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-3.7) vs. 2.9 (95% CI 2.5-3.4), respectively (p=0.30). Similarly, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes (24-hour pad weight, voiding diary parameters, or condition-specific patient-reported outcomes). The results were similar within the OAB and neurogenic bladder subgroups.
conclusionsTTNS does not appear to be effective for treating urinary symptoms of people with OAB or neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.