Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32017430›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2020

Neural substrates of mnemonic discrimination: A whole-brain fMRI investigation.

Jenna L Klippenstein, Shauna M Stark, Craig E L Stark, Ilana J Bennett

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05846425 (Investigating the Effect of Yoga-based Breathing Styles on the Human Brain, With a Focus on Memory), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05846425 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Effect of Yoga-based Breathing Styles on the Human Brain, With a Focus on Memory

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversität des SaarlandesRan2023 to 2024Enrolled75ConditionsHypoventilation, HyperventilationArmsNose-breathing training, Mouth-breathing training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The human hippocampus can pattern separate memories by meaning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A compressed code for memory discrimination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenna L KlippensteinDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-1340
Shauna M StarkDepartment of Neurobiology & Behavior, University of California, Irvine, California.
Craig E L StarkDepartment of Neurobiology & Behavior, University of California, Irvine, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-8502
Ilana J BennettDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California.

Funding

The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the University of California, IrvineP30AG066519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Elizabeth Head · 2020 to 2026
$27.9M
High-resolution multimodal imaging of episodic memory networks in aging.R00AG047334 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI BENNETT, ILANA JACQUELINE · 2016 to 2018
$737k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS R00 AG047334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA fundamental component of episodic memory is the ability to differentiate new and highly similar events from previously encountered events. Numerous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified hippocampal involvement in this type of mnemonic discrimination (MD), but few studies have assessed MD-related activity in regions beyond the hippocampus. Therefore, the current fMRI study examined whole-brain activity in healthy young adults during successful discrimination of the test phase of the Mnemonic Similarity Task.

methodIn the study phase, participants made "indoor"/"outdoor" judgments to a series of objects. In the test phase, they made "old"/"new" judgments to a series of probe objects that were either repetitions from the memory set (targets), similar to objects in the memory set (lures), or novel. We assessed hippocampal and whole-brain activity consistent with MD using a step function to identify where activity to targets differed from activity to lures with varying degrees of similarity to targets (high, low), responding to them as if they were novel.

resultsResults revealed that the hippocampus and occipital cortex exhibited differential activity to repeated stimuli relative to even highly similar stimuli, but only hippocampal activity predicted discrimination performance.

conclusionsThese findings are consistent with the notion that successful MD is supported by the hippocampus, with auxiliary processes supported by cortex (e.g., perceptual discrimination).

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentBrainBrain MappingDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adultcortexepisodic memoryfMRIhippocampusmnemonic discrimination

Identifiers

PMID32017430
PMCPMC7066353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.