Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32017294›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2020

Local- and landscape-scale variables shape insect diversity in an urban biodiversity hot spot.

Benjamin J Adams, Enjie Li, Christine A Bahlai, Emily K Meineke, Terrence P McGlynn, Brian V Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Local- and landscape-scale variables shape insect diversity in an urban biodiversity hot spot.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Biodiversity data journal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin J AdamsUrban Nature Research Center, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, 90007, USA.
Enjie LiUrban Nature Research Center, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, 90007, USA.
Christine A BahlaiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 44242, USA.
Emily K MeinekeDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, USA.
Terrence P McGlynnDepartment of Biology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, California, 90747, USA.
Brian V BrownUrban Nature Research Center, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, 90007, USA.

Funding

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles Countythe Seaver Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local community structure is shaped by processes acting at local and landscape scales. The relative importance of drivers operating across different spatial scales is difficult to test without observations across regional or latitudinal gradients. Cities exhibit strong but predictable environmental gradients overlaying a mosaic of highly variable but repeated habitat types within a constrained area. Thus, cities present a unique opportunity to explore how both local and landscape factors influence local biotic communities. We used insect communities to examine the interactions among local environmental variables (such as temperature and relative humidity), local habitat characteristics (such as plant community composition), and broad-scale patterns of urbanization (including biophysical, human-built, and socioeconomic variables) on local insect abundance, species richness, and species composition in Los Angeles, a hot, dry, near-desert city. After accounting for seasonal trends, insect species richness and abundance were highest in drier and hotter sites, but the magnitude of local environmental effects varied with the degree of urbanization. In contrast, insect species composition was best predicted by broad-scale urbanization trends, with the more native communities occurring in less urbanized sites and more cosmopolitan insects occurring in highly urbanized sites. However, insect species richness and abundance were >30% higher and insect composition was similar across sites that hosted either native or drought-tolerant plants, regardless of the degree of urbanization. These results demonstrate that urban insect biodiversity is a product of interacting mechanisms working at both local and landscape scales. However, local-scale changes to urban habitats, such as cultivating plants that are adapted to the natural environment nearest the city, can positively impact urban biodiversity regardless of location.

Indexed as

BiodiversityInsectaAnimalsCitiesEcosystemHumansUrbanizationcitizen sciencecommunity ecologyDipteraHymenopteraLepidopteraLos Angeles

Identifiers

PMID32017294
PMCPMC7317463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.