Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32017229›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020

Diagnosis efficacy of CEUS for hepatic inflammatory lesions.

Yuanyuan Guo, Xiachuan Qin, Shaoxian Chen, Xuebin Liu, Peng Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Klebsiella liver phlegmon mimicking a solid liver tumour.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnosis efficacy of CEUS for hepatic inflammatory lesions.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuanyuan GuoDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Xiachuan QinDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanchong Central Hospital, Sichuan, China.
Shaoxian ChenRadiology Department, Gaoping District People Hospital of Nanchong, Nanchong, China.
Xuebin LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanchong Central Hospital, Sichuan, China.
Peng GuDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-4414

Funding

Research Development Program at School Level of Northern Sichuan Medical College in 2017 CBY17-A-YB30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, the efficacy of US/CEUS and clinicopathologic parameters in differential diagnosis of hepatic inflammatory lesions were evaluated.

methodsThis was a retrospective study in which CEUS imaging was performed on 182 patients. Among these patients, 44 patients had hepatic inflammatory lesions and 138 patients had malignant lesions. The ultrasound (US), CEUS, and clinicopathologic parameters with respect to differential diagnosis of hepatic inflammatory lesions were analyzed.

resultsIrregular lesion shape and unclear margin were commonly seen in hepatic inflammatory lesions by US/CEUS examination. Hypoenhancement in arterial phase (AP) and portal venous phase (PVP), and isoenhancement in delayed phase (DP) were more commonly found in inflammatory lesions rather than malignant lesions [9% (4/44), 68% (30/44), and 16% (7/44) vs 2% (3/138), 11% (15/138), 1% (1/138), respectively; P < .05]. The enhancement coverage was also a significant indicator for the differentiation of inflammatory lesions and malignant lesions (P < .05). History of hepatitis or cirrhosis, and higher serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level were indicators for malignant lesions, while liver parasites and higher body temperature were indicators for inflammatory lesions. When the US/CEUS findings were combined with clinicopathologic parameters, the diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory lesions could reach 93.3%, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 63.64%, 96.03%, 84.85%, and 88.32%, respectively.

conclusionThe US/CEUS findings combined with clinical characteristics can accurately differentiate hepatic inflammatory lesions and malignant lesions. The results of study will improve the diagnostic confidence for hepatic inflammatory lesions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHepatitisHumansLiver Abscess, PyogenicLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyYoung AdultContrast Mediacontrast-enhanced ultrasound imagingdifferential diagnosishepatic inflammatory lesion

Identifiers

PMID32017229
PMCPMC7307339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.