Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32017159›Full record

ArticleArtificial organs2020

Comparative study of tapered versus conventional cylindrical balloon for stent implantation in stenotic tapered artery.

Xiang Shen, Jiabao Jiang, Hongfei Zhu, Kaikai Lu, Pengfei Dong, Linxia Gu

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial organs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiang ShenSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-980X
Jiabao JiangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Hongfei ZhuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Kaikai LuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Pengfei DongDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Linxia GuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Jiangsu University · CNUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Computer assisted coronary artery stent interventionsR01HL143484 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BEZERRA, HIRAM, WILSON, DAVID LYNN · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2011M500858Foundation of Jiangsu University 10JDG123National Natural Science Foundation of China 51305171Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20130525Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province 13KJB460006NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143484Project of Jiangsu University for training young backbone teachers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural tapering of coronary arteries often creates a dilemma for optimal balloon sizing during stenting. The influence of different balloon types, namely, a tapered balloon and a conventional cylindrical balloon, on the mechanical performance of the stent as well as arterial mechanics was investigated via the finite element method. Stent free-expansion and stent deployment in a stenotic tapered artery were investigated numerically. The biomechanical behavior of the two balloon types was compared in terms of stent foreshortening, stent deformation, stent stress distribution, and arterial wall stress distribution. Results indicate that balloon types affect the transient behavior of the stent and the arterial mechanics. Specifically, a tapered balloon could maintain the natural tapering of the coronary artery after stent expansion. In contrast to a cylindrical balloon, tapered balloon also mitigated the foreshortening of the stent (7.69%) as well as the stress concentration in the stent and artery (8.61% and 4.17%, respectively). Hence, tapered balloons should be used in tapered arteries as they may result in low risk of artery injury. This study might provide insights for improved balloon choice and presurgical planning.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFinite Element AnalysisHumansProsthesis DesignStentsStress, Mechanicalarterial mechanicsballoon configurationfinite element analysisstent expansiontapered arterytapered balloon

Identifiers

PMID32017159
PMCPMC9379866
OpenAlexW3004660053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.