Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32016920›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2020

Examination of a Canadian provincial prenatal HIV screening program: 2010 to 2014.

Sabrina S Plitt, Trenton R Smith, Warren Berry, Mariam Osman, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan, Carmen L Charlton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina S PlittPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Trenton R SmithSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Warren BerrySchool of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Mariam OsmanAlberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ambikaipakan SenthilselvanSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Carmen L CharltonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Carmen.Charlton@aplabs.ca.
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Health · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUniversal prenatal screening in the Canadian province of Alberta employs an 'opt-out' HIV screening strategy. We examined all women giving birth in the province and determined the frequency and characteristics of women having and not having HIV screening.

methodsAll livebirths in Alberta from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014 were compiled from the Vital Statistics database and linked to HIV screening data to determine maternal demographic and prenatal care characteristics. Correlates associated with prenatal HIV screening, opting out of HIV screening, and not having any prenatal communicable disease screening were determined by multivariable statistics.

resultsOf the 256,280 live births, 94.2% had prenatal HIV screening, 1.9% declined prenatal HIV screening, and 3.9% had no record of any prenatal communicable disease testing. Compared with those who had HIV screening, those who opted out of prenatal HIV screening were more likely to be over 40 years of age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 2.83 [2.12-3.78]) and less likely to be single (AOR, 0.67 [0.62-0.73]) and First Nations (AOR, 0.67 [0.56-0.82]). Those who received no prenatal communicable disease screening were less likely to be over 40 years of age (AOR, 0.81 [0.69-0.95]) and more likely to be single (AOR, 1.27 [1.21-1.33]) and have received no prenatal care (AOR, 6.78 [6.40-7.19]). Both the HIV decliners and prenatal non-testers were more likely to have used a midwife (AOR, 4.52 [3.83-5.35] and AOR, 2.44 [2.03-2.92], respectively).

conclusionDemographic and prenatal care characteristics differ by a pregnant woman's prenatal screening status. Policies to improve HIV screening coverage should take these variations into account.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPrenatal DiagnosisAlbertaFemaleHumansPregnancyProgram EvaluationCanadaHIVPregnancyPrenatal screening

Identifiers

PMID32016920
PMCPMC7438462
OpenAlexW3005081610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.