Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32016561›Full record

ReviewRice (New York, N.Y.)2020

How to start your monocot CRISPR/Cas project: plasmid design, efficiency detection, and offspring analysis.

Jin-Jun Yue, Chwan-Yang Hong, Pengcheng Wei, Yu-Chang Tsai, Choun-Sea Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rice (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Hotter, drier, CRISPR: the latest edit on climate change.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jin-Jun YueResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, China.
Chwan-Yang HongDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pengcheng WeiKey Laboratory of Rice Genetic Breeding of Anhui Province, Rice Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, China.
Yu-Chang TsaiDepartment of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Choun-Sea LinAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. cslin99@gate.sinica.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9566-2952
National Taiwan University · TWAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica · TWChinese Academy of Forestry · CNRice Research Institute · CN

Funding

Academia Sinica AS-KPQ-107-ITAR-10Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 105-2313-B-001 -007 -MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2313-B-001-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breakthrough CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas9-mediated genome-editing technology has led to great progress in monocot research; however, several factors need to be considered for the efficient implementation of this technology. To generate genome-edited crops, single guide (sg)RNA and Cas9 DNA are delivered into plant cells and expressed, and the predicted position is targeted. Analyses of successful targeted mutations have revealed that the expression levels, expression timing, and variants of both sgRNA and Cas9 need to be sophisticatedly regulated; therefore, the promoters of these genes and the target site positions are the key factors for genome-editing efficiency. Currently, various vectors and online tools are available to aid sgRNA design. Furthermore, to reduce the sequence limitation of the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and for other purposes, many Cas protein variants and base editors can be used in plants. Before the stable transformation of a plant, the evaluation of vectors and target sites is therefore very important. Moreover, the delivery of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) is one strategy that can be used to prevent transgene issues with the expression of sgRNA and Cas proteins. RNPs can be used to efficiently generate transgene-free genome-edited crops that can reduce transgene issues related to the generation of genetically modified organisms. In this review, we introduce new techniques for genome editing and identifying marker-free genome-edited mutants in monocot crops. Four topics are covered: the design and construction of plasmids for genome editing in monocots; alternatives to SpCas9; protoplasts and CRISPR; and screening for marker-free CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants. We have aimed to encompass a full spectrum of information for genome editing in monocot crops.

Indexed as

Cas12aGenome editingPlant transformationPromoterProtoplast

Identifiers

PMID32016561
PMCPMC6997315
OpenAlexW3005209155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.