Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32016526›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Precipitation and predation risk alter the diversity and behavior of pollinators and reduce plant fitness.

Pablo A P Antiqueira, Paula M de Omena, Thiago Gonçalves-Souza, Camila Vieira, Gustavo H Migliorini, Mônica F Kersch-Becker, Tiago N Bernabé, Fátima C Recalde, Sandra Benavides- Gordillo, Gustavo Q Romero

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo A P AntiqueiraLaboratório de Interações Multitróficas e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil. pabloantiqueira@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1118-8796
Paula M de OmenaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5221-7901
Thiago Gonçalves-SouzaLaboratório de Síntese Ecológica e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8471-7479
Camila VieiraLaboratório de Interações Multitróficas e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7433-8360
Gustavo H MiglioriniLaboratório de Interações Multitróficas e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Mônica F Kersch-BeckerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7578-2858
Tiago N BernabéLaboratório de Interações Multitróficas e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-2076
Fátima C RecaldeLaboratório de Interações Multitróficas e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Sandra Benavides- GordilloLaboratório de Interações Multitróficas e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Gustavo Q RomeroLaboratório de Interações Multitróficas e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 2014/0603-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2010/51523-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/26243-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biotic and abiotic factors may individually or interactively disrupt plant-pollinator interactions, influencing plant fitness. Although variations in temperature and precipitation are expected to modify the overall impact of predators on plant-pollinator interactions, few empirical studies have assessed if these weather conditions influence anti-predator behaviors and how this context-dependent response may cascade down to plant fitness. To answer this question, we manipulated predation risk (using artificial spiders) in different years to investigate how natural variation in temperature and precipitation may affect diversity (richness and composition) and behavioral (visitation) responses of flower-visiting insects to predation risk, and how these effects influence plant fitness. Our findings indicate that predation risk and an increase in precipitation independently reduced plant fitness (i.e., seed set) by decreasing flower visitation. Predation risk reduced pollinator visitation and richness, and altered species composition of pollinators. Additionally, an increase in precipitation was associated with lower flower visitation and pollinator richness but did not alter pollinator species composition. However, maximum daily temperature did not affect any component of the pollinator assemblage or plant fitness. Our results indicate that biotic and abiotic drivers have different impacts on pollinator behavior and diversity with consequences for plant fitness components. Even small variation in precipitation conditions promotes complex and substantial cascading effects on plants by affecting both pollinator communities and the outcome of plant-pollinator interactions. Tropical communities are expected to be highly susceptible to climatic changes, and these changes may have drastic consequences for biotic interactions in the tropics.

Indexed as

PollinationPredatory BehaviorAnimalsFlowersInsectaPlantsCascading effectClimatic conditionsPlant–pollinator interactionsPredationVisual cues

Identifiers

PMID32016526
OpenAlexW3004570722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.