Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32016523›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Snoring: is a reliable assessment possible?

René Fischer, Thomas S Kuehnel, Veronika Vielsmeier, Frank Haubner, Steffen Mueller, Christian Rohrmeier

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of hypoglossal nerve stimulation on snoring: an evaluation using objective acoustic parameters.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. In-home mandibular repositioning during sleep using MATRx plus predicts outcome and efficacious positioning for oral appliance treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

René FischerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas S KuehnelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Veronika VielsmeierDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Frank HaubnerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Steffen MuellerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian RohrmeierFaculty of Medicine, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. christian.rohrmeier@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-5382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is not easy to assess how severe and annoying a patient's snoring is. Solid parameters are lacking; snorers cannot deliver a reliable self-assessment and it is uncertain whether bed partners' statements can be relied upon. The purpose of the present study was therefore to investigate whether and how well snoring assessment based on acoustic parameters and bed partners' reporting agree.

methodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled study on snoring treatment, several acoustic parameters [snoring index (SI), percentage snoring time (ST), sound pressure level, sound energy, loudness, psychoacoustic annoyance and psychoacoustic snore score (PSS)] were measured in 18 subjects during 24 polysomnographies. Bed partners also assessed snoring annoyance and loudness as well as treatment outcome.

resultsNo correlation was found between the subjective annoyance caused by snoring and the acoustic parameters. Regarding perceived loudness, there was a moderate, significant correlation with loudness (N

conclusionsThe non-existent or only weak correlation between bed partners' ratings and objective parameters indicate that snoring severity should be evaluated with caution. Neither acoustic parameters, at least for one measurement over just one night, nor bed partners' ratings should be used as the sole basis for snoring assessment.

Indexed as

AcousticsSnoringHumansPolysomnographyPsychoacousticsSound SpectrographyAcoustic assessmentAnnoyanceBed partnerSnoringSnoring index

Identifiers

PMID32016523
PMCPMC7072038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.