Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32016520›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

A novel preoperative scoring system to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases.

Peng Liu, You Li, Hong-Fan Ding, Ding-Hui Dong, Xu-Feng Zhang, Xue-Min Liu, Yi Lv, Jun-Xi Xiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peng Liu *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yan-ta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
You Li *Department of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Hong-Fan DingDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yan-ta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Ding-Hui DongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yan-ta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Xu-Feng ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yan-ta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Xue-Min LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yan-ta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Yi LvDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yan-ta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P. R. China.
Jun-Xi XiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yan-ta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P. R. China. xjx123@xjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2370-7810
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has been proven to be a safe and advantageous procedure. To ensure that resections of appropriate difficulty are selected, an objective preoperative grading of difficulty is required. We aimed to develop a predictive difficulty grading of LS based on intraoperative complications.

methodsA total of 272 non-traumatic patients who underwent LS were identified from a regional medical center. Patients were randomized into a training cohort (n = 222) and a validation cohort (n = 50). Data on demographics, medical and surgical history, operative and pathological characteristics, and postoperative outcome details were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for intraoperative complications were performed to develop a difficulty scoring system. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the difficulty grading score and intraoperative outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discriminatory power of this scoring system.

resultsThree preoperative factors (spleen weight, esophagogastric varices, and INR) had a significant effect on operative time, bleeding, and conversion to open surgery. We created a difficulty grading score with three levels of difficulty: low (≤ 4 points), medium (5-6 points), and high (≥ 7 points), based on the three preoperative parameters. The correlation was highly significant (P < 0.01) according to Spearman's correlation. The area under the ROC curve was 0.695 (95% CI 0.630-0.755). The external validation showed significant correlations with the present model, with an AUC of 0.725 (95% CI 0.580-0.842). The comparison between our difficulty score and the previous grading system in the 272-patient cohort presented a significant difference in the AUC (0.701, 95% CI 0.643-0.755 vs. 0.644, 95% CI 0.584-0.701, P = 0.0452).

conclusionThe present difficulty scoring system, based on preoperative factors, has good performance in predicting the risk of intraoperative complications of LS and could be helpful for enabling appropriate case selection with respect to the current experience of a surgeon.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSplenectomyConversionDifficulty scoring systemIntraoperative complicationLaparoscopic splenectomyNon-traumatic diseases

Identifiers

PMID32016520
OpenAlexW3005285037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.