Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32016519›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2021

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing simethicone, N-acetylcysteine, sodium bicarbonate and peppermint for visualization in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Prasit Mahawongkajit, Amonpon Kanlerd

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07245095 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Premedication With N-acetylcysteine and Simethicone on Mucosal Visibility During Elective Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Using the TUGS Score), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07245095 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Premedication With N-acetylcysteine and Simethicone on Mucosal Visibility During Elective Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Using the TUGS Score

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General de MexicaliRan2025 to 2026Enrolled132ConditionsEsophagogastroduodenoscopy, Simethicone, N-Acetylcysteine, PremedicationArmsPremedication with n-acetylcysteine, Placebo (drinking water), Premedication with simethicone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prasit MahawongkajitDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University (Rangsit Campus), 99/209 Moo 18, Paholyothin Road, Amphur Klongluang, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand. prasit_md@yahoo.com.
Amonpon KanlerdDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University (Rangsit Campus), 99/209 Moo 18, Paholyothin Road, Amphur Klongluang, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Thammasat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEarly cancer detection is crucial in improving the patients' quality of life and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) plays a key role in this detection. Many clearing mechanisms may be applied to create good endoscopic visualizations for the upper gastrointestinal tract using mucolytic agents, antifoaming agents, proteolytic enzymes and neutralizers. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of simethicone, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), sodium bicarbonate and peppermint as pre-medications for visualization of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

methodsThis study was a single center prospective randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups. Group A: water; Group B: water with simethicone; Group C: water with simethicone plus NAC 600 mg; Group D: water with simethicone, NAC, sodium bicarbonate and peppermint.

resultsA total of 128 patients were enrolled and evaluated in this study. Total visibility score (TVS) of Groups A, B, C, and D were 13.4 ± 1.86, 10.5 ± 1.45, 7.15 ± 0.98 and 6.4 ± 1.43, respectively. Group D showed lower TVS than other groups. The procedural durations of Groups C and D were significantly shorter than Group A. The volume of solution for mucosal cleansing of Groups C and D was significantly lower than Groups A and B.

conclusionsThe application of simethicone plus NAC is safe, improves endoscopic visualization and requires a minimal amount of mucosal cleansing solution. The addition of sodium bicarbonate and peppermint further improved visualization for the upper and lower gastric body. Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) with a reference number; TCTR20190501002.

Indexed as

AcetylcysteineEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansMaleMentha piperitaMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSimethiconeSodium BicarbonateAcetylcysteineSimethiconeSodium BicarbonateEndoscopyN-acetylcysteinePeppermintSimethiconeSodium bicarbonate

Identifiers

PMID32016519
OpenAlexW3004599616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.