Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015909›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2019

Worldwide survey of flexible ureteroscopy practice: a survey from European Association of Urology sections of young academic urologists and uro-technology groups.

Amelia Pietropaolo, Ewa Bres-Niewada, Andreas Skolarikos, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Omar Aboumarzouk, Thomas Tailly, Silvia Proietti, Oliver Traxer, Guido Giusti and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Amelia PietropaoloUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ewa Bres-NiewadaRoefler Memorial Hospital, Department of Urology, Pruszków, Poland.
Andreas SkolarikosUniversity of Athens, 2 Department of Urology, Athens, Greece.
Evangelos LiatsikosUniversity of Patras, Department of Urology, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisUniversity of Patras, Department of Urology, Patras, Greece.
Omar AboumarzoukNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Department of Urology, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Thomas TaillyUniversitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Department of Urology, Gent, Belgium.
Silvia ProiettiIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Ville Turro Division, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Oliver TraxerTenon Hospital, Assitance Publique-Hopitaux De Paris, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Department of Urology, Paris, France.
Guido GiustiIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Ville Turro Division, Department of Urology, Milan, Italy.
Nick RukinMetro North Hospitals and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Mehmet ÖzsoyMedical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Department of Urology, Vienna, Austria.
Michele TalsoASST Vimercate Hospital, Department of Urology, Vimercate, Monza Brianza, Italy.
Sener Tarik EmreMarmara University, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Esteban EmilianiFundació Puigvert, Urolithiasis Division, Barcelona, Spain.
Gokhan AtisIstanbul Medeniyet University, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bhaskar K SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Patras · GRAzienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate · ITGhent University Hospital · BEIstanbul Medeniyet University · TRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleMarmara University · TRNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBPuigvert Foundation · ESSorbonne Université · FRVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo understand the current practice of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), we conducted a worldwide survey among urologists with a special interest in endourology. MATERIAL AND

methodsA 42-question survey was designed after an initial consultation with European Association of Urology young academic urologists (YAU) and uro-technology (ESUT) groups. This was distributed via the SurveyMonkey

resultsA total of 114 completed responses were obtained. A safety guidewire was reportedly used by 84.5% of endourologists, an access sheath was always or almost always used by 71% and a reusable laser fibre was used by two-thirds of respondents. While a combination of dusting and fragmentation was used by 47% as a preferred mode of intra-renal stone treatment, some used dusting (43%) or fragmentation with basketing (10%).Disposable scopes were only used by 40% and three quarters of them used it for challenging cases only. Antibiotic prophylaxis was limited to a single peri-operative dose by two-thirds (67%) of respondents. The procedural time was limited to between 1-2 hours by two-thirds (70%) of respondents and very rarely (7.4%) it exceeded 2 hours. The irrigation method varied between manual pump (46%), mechanical irrigation (22%) or gravity irrigation (27%).

conclusionsOur survey shows a wide variation in the available endourological armamentarium and surgical practice amongst urologists. However, there seems to be a broad agreement in the use of peri-operative antibiotics, access sheath usage, method of stone treatment and the use of post-operative stent.

Indexed as

access sheathendourologyflexiblefragmentationlaserstonesurveyureteroscopyurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID32015909
PMCPMC6979553
OpenAlexW3012487350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.