Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015883›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Epidemiological profile of emergency medical services in Japan: a population-based descriptive study in 2016.

Shunichiro Nakao, Yusuke Katayama, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Tomoya Hirose, Junya Sado, Kenichiro Ishida, Jotaro Tachino, Yutaka Umemura, Takeyuki Kiguchi, Tasuku Matsuyama and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characteristics and outcomes of pediatric blunt renal trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Japan.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shunichiro NakaoDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-806X
Yusuke KatayamaDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-4259
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences Department of Social and Environmental Medicine Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-0580
Tomoya HiroseDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-4569
Junya SadoDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences Department of Social and Environmental Medicine Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Suita Japan.
Kenichiro IshidaDepartment of Acute Medicine and Critical Care Medical Center Osaka National Hospital National Hospital Organization Osaka Japan.
Jotaro TachinoDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-7713
Yutaka UmemuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Osaka General Medical Center Osaka Japan.
Takeyuki KiguchiKyoto University Health Service Kyoto Japan.
Tasuku MatsuyamaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Kosuke KiyoharaDepartment of Food Science Faculty of Home Economics Otsuma Women's University Tokyo Japan.
Takeshi ShimazuDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan.
The University of Osaka · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPKyoto University · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPOsaka Police Hospital · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPOtsuma Women's University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of our study is to describe the characteristics of patients who use emergency medical services (EMS), EMS performance, and regional variations in Japan.

methodsWe undertook a nationwide, population-based, descriptive review of anonymized ambulance transport records obtained from the Fire and Disaster Management Agency in Japan. All emergency patients transported to emergency medical institutions by EMS personnel from January to December 2016 were enrolled in this study, excluding patients who were not transported.

resultsDuring the study period, 5,097,838 patients were transported to a hospital. Their median age was 69 years, 51.4% were male, and 56.5% were over 65 years old. Median durations from EMS call to EMS arrival on scene were similar among the regions, ranging from 7 to 9 min. However, the longest median duration from EMS call to hospital arrival was 38 min, and the shortest was 31 min across the regions. Among all patients, 350,865 (6.9%) were assessed as being in a severe condition, 14,410 (0.3%) were in very severe condition, and 74,780 (1.5%) were confirmed to be dead at the time of initial medical examination in the emergency department.

conclusionsWe described the characteristics of emergency patients and EMS performance in Japan. This registry serves as a basis for providing relevant information to improve prehospital emergency medical systems.

Indexed as

Emergency medical serviceepidemiologyprehospital care

Identifiers

PMID32015883
PMCPMC6992505
OpenAlexW3004271795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.