Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015865›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Ecological costs of climate change on marine predator-prey population distributions by 2050.

Dinara Sadykova, Beth E Scott, Michela De Dominicis, Sarah L Wakelin, Judith Wolf, Alexander Sadykov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Assessing the Trophic Impact of Bleaching: The Model PairAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Decadal changes in blood δProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dinara SadykovaInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3930-5974
Beth E ScottInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.
Michela De DominicisNational Oceanography Centre Liverpool UK.
Sarah L WakelinNational Oceanography Centre Liverpool UK.
Judith WolfNational Oceanography Centre Liverpool UK.
Alexander SadykovInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.
National Oceanography Centre · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying and quantifying the effects of climate change that alter the habitat overlap of marine predators and their prey population distributions is of great importance for the sustainable management of populations. This study uses Bayesian joint models with integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) to predict future spatial density distributions in the form of common spatial trends of predator-prey overlap in 2050 under the "business-as-usual, worst-case" climate change scenario. This was done for combinations of six mobile marine predator species (gray seal, harbor seal, harbor porpoise, common guillemot, black-legged kittiwake, and northern gannet) and two of their common prey species (herring and sandeels). A range of five explanatory variables that cover both physical and biological aspects of critical marine habitat were used as follows: bottom temperature, stratification, depth-averaged speed, net primary production, and maximum subsurface chlorophyll. Four different methods were explored to quantify relative ecological cost/benefits of climate change to the common spatial trends of predator-prey density distributions. All but one future joint model showed significant decreases in overall spatial percentage change. The most dramatic loss in predator-prey population overlap was shown by harbor seals with large declines in the common spatial trend for both prey species. On the positive side, both gannets and guillemots are projected to have localized regions with increased overlap with sandeels. Most joint predator-prey models showed large changes in centroid location, however the direction of change in centroids was not simply northwards, but mostly ranged from northwest to northeast. This approach can be very useful in informing the design of spatial management policies under climate change by using the potential differences in ecological costs to weigh up the trade-offs in decisions involving issues of large-scale spatial use of our oceans, such as marine protected areas, commercial fishing, and large-scale marine renewable developments.

Indexed as

Besagcritical marine habitatfishintegrated nested Laplace approximationmarine mammalspredator–preyseabirdsspatial joint modelingYork and Mollie (BYM) models

Identifiers

PMID32015865
PMCPMC6988555
OpenAlexW2999168429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.