ArticleEcology and evolution2020
Species-level image classification with convolutional neural network enables insect identification from habitus images.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-angle, cross-domain fusion strategy enhances automated insect identification and hierarchical categorization: a case study on assassin bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae).Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2026Article
- Evaluation of BugBox, a software platform for AI-assisted bioinventories of arthropods.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Machine learning training data: over 500,000 images of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) with species labels.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Towards precision agriculture: metaheuristic model compression for enhanced pest recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- InsectNet: Real-time identification of insects using an end-to-end machine learning pipeline.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- AI-Enabled Crop Management Framework for Pest Detection Using Visual Sensor Data.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A convolutional neural network to identify mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) of the genus Aedes by wing images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- Deep learning image analysis for filamentous fungi taxonomic classification: Dealing with small datasets with class imbalance and hierarchical grouping.Biology methods & protocols · 2024Article
- Wing Interferential Patterns (WIPs) and machine learning for the classification of some Aedes species of medical interest.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Untargeted Metabolomics for Integrative Taxonomy: Metabolomics, DNA Marker-Based Sequencing, and Phenotype Bioimaging.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Recognizability bias in citizen science photographs.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- New trends in detection of harmful insects and pests in modern agriculture using artificial neural networks. a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- From identification to forecasting: the potential of image recognition and artificial intelligence for aphid pest monitoring.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Orchard monitoring based on unmanned aerial vehicles and image processing by artificial neural networks: a systematic review.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- An Efficient Pest Detection Framework with a Medium-Scale Benchmark to Increase the Agricultural Productivity.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reference bioimaging to assess the phenotypic trait diversity of bryophytes within the family Scapaniaceae.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Article
- Towards Machine Vision for Insect Welfare Monitoring and Behavioural Insights.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Deep learning and computer vision will transform entomology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in insect biomass, abundance, and diversity are challenging to track at sufficient spatial, temporal, and taxonomic resolution. Camera traps can capture habitus images of ground-dwelling insects. However, currently sampling involves manually detecting and identifying specimens. Here, we test whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) can classify habitus images of ground beetles to species level, and estimate how correct classification relates to body size, number of species inside genera, and species identity.We created an image database of 65,841 museum specimens comprising 361 carabid beetle species from the British Isles and fine-tuned the parameters of a pretrained CNN from a training dataset. By summing up class confidence values within genus, tribe, and subfamily and setting a confidence threshold, we trade-off between classification accuracy, precision, and recall and taxonomic resolution.The CNN classified 51.9% of 19,164 test images correctly to species level and 74.9% to genus level. Average classification recall on species level was 50.7%. Applying a threshold of 0.5 increased the average classification recall to 74.6% at the expense of taxonomic resolution. Higher top value from the output layer and larger sized species were more often classified correctly, as were images of species in genera with few species.Fine-tuning enabled us to classify images with a high mean recall for the whole test dataset to species or higher taxonomic levels, however, with high variability. This indicates that some species are more difficult to identify because of properties such as their body size or the number of related species.Together, species-level image classification of arthropods from museum collections and ecological monitoring can substantially increase the amount of occurrence data that can feasibly be collected. These tools thus provide new opportunities in understanding and predicting ecological responses to environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.