Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015839›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Species-level image classification with convolutional neural network enables insect identification from habitus images.

Oskar L P Hansen, Jens-Christian Svenning, Kent Olsen, Steen Dupont, Beulah H Garner, Alexandros Iosifidis, Benjamin W Price, Toke T Høye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Deep learning and computer vision will transform entomology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oskar L P HansenDepartment of Bioscience Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE) Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1598-5733
Jens-Christian SvenningDepartment of Bioscience Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE) Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-0862
Kent OlsenNatural History Museum Aarhus Aarhus C Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5624-128X
Steen DupontLife Sciences Natural History Museum London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6766-2840
Beulah H GarnerLife Sciences Natural History Museum London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5229-2450
Alexandros IosifidisDepartment of Engineering - Signal Processing Aarhus University Aarhus N Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-1345
Benjamin W PriceLife Sciences Natural History Museum London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5497-4087
Toke T HøyeDepartment of Bioscience and Arctic Research Centre Aarhus University Rønde Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284
Aarhus University · DKNatural History Museum · GBNatural History Museum Aarhus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in insect biomass, abundance, and diversity are challenging to track at sufficient spatial, temporal, and taxonomic resolution. Camera traps can capture habitus images of ground-dwelling insects. However, currently sampling involves manually detecting and identifying specimens. Here, we test whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) can classify habitus images of ground beetles to species level, and estimate how correct classification relates to body size, number of species inside genera, and species identity.We created an image database of 65,841 museum specimens comprising 361 carabid beetle species from the British Isles and fine-tuned the parameters of a pretrained CNN from a training dataset. By summing up class confidence values within genus, tribe, and subfamily and setting a confidence threshold, we trade-off between classification accuracy, precision, and recall and taxonomic resolution.The CNN classified 51.9% of 19,164 test images correctly to species level and 74.9% to genus level. Average classification recall on species level was 50.7%. Applying a threshold of 0.5 increased the average classification recall to 74.6% at the expense of taxonomic resolution. Higher top value from the output layer and larger sized species were more often classified correctly, as were images of species in genera with few species.Fine-tuning enabled us to classify images with a high mean recall for the whole test dataset to species or higher taxonomic levels, however, with high variability. This indicates that some species are more difficult to identify because of properties such as their body size or the number of related species.Together, species-level image classification of arthropods from museum collections and ecological monitoring can substantially increase the amount of occurrence data that can feasibly be collected. These tools thus provide new opportunities in understanding and predicting ecological responses to environmental change.

Indexed as

arthropod samplingautomatic species identificationcamera trapentomological collectionimage classificationimage database

Identifiers

PMID32015839
PMCPMC6988528
OpenAlexW2997849610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.