Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015764›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2020

Identification of vowels in consonant-vowel-consonant words from speech imagery based EEG signals.

Sandhya Chengaiyan, Anandha Sree Retnapandian, Kavitha Anandan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Imagined speech classification exploiting EEG power spectrum features.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Key technology of brain-computer interaction based on speech imagery].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandhya ChengaiyanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Healthcare Technologies, SSN College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamilnadu India.ORCID 0000-0001-6236-1491
Anandha Sree RetnapandianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Healthcare Technologies, SSN College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamilnadu India.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-0031
Kavitha AnandanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Healthcare Technologies, SSN College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamilnadu India.ORCID 0000-0002-3890-6399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval of unintelligible speech is a basic need for speech impaired and is under research for several decades. But retrieval of random words from thoughts needs a substantial and consistent approach. This work focuses on the preliminary steps of retrieving vowels from Electroencephalography (EEG) signals acquired while speaking and imagining of speaking a consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) word. The process, referred to as Speech imagery is imagining of speaking to oneself silently in the mind. Speech imagery is a form of mental imagery. Brain connectivity estimators such as EEG coherence, Partial Directed Coherence, Directed Transfer Function and Transfer Entropy have been used to estimate the concurrency and causal dependence (direction and strength) between different brain regions. From brain connectivity results it has been observed that the left frontal and left temporal electrodes were activated for speech and speech imagery processes. These brain connectivity estimators have been used for training Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Deep Belief Networks (DBN) for identifying the vowel from the subject's thought. Though the accuracy level was found to be varying for each vowel while speaking and imagining of speaking the CVC word, the overall classification accuracy was found to be 72% while using RNN whereas a classification accuracy of 80% was observed while using DBN. DBN was found to outperform RNN in both the speech and speech imagery processes. Thus, the combination of brain connectivity estimators and deep learning techniques appear to be effective in identifying the vowel from EEG signals of subjects' thought.

Indexed as

Brain connectivity estimatorsDeep Belief Networks (DBN)Electroencephalography (EEG)Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)Speech imagery

Identifiers

PMID32015764
PMCPMC6974026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.