Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015753›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

Acupuncture Therapy plus Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yang Zheng, Xiangdong Duan, Shangfeng Qi, Haibo Hu, Mengran Wang, Conglin Ren, Haipeng Xu, Renfu Quan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bibliometric analysis of the inflammatory mechanisms in knee osteoarthritis in recent 30 years.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yang ZhengClinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310051, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7153-2026
Xiangdong DuanDepartment of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250014, China.
Shangfeng QiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250014, China.
Haibo HuClinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250014, China.
Mengran WangClinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310051, China.
Conglin RenClinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310051, China.
Haipeng XuClinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310051, China.
Renfu QuanDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiaoshan Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Hangzhou 311200, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8638-867X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture therapy plus hyaluronic acid injection versus hyaluronic acid injection alone for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

methodsRelevant randomized controlled trials that compared the combined effect of acupuncture therapy and hyaluronic acid injection with hyaluronic acid injection alone for knee osteoarthritis patients were included. 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the relative risk (RR) and weight mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for the Lysholm knee score (LKSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), and effective rate (ER) were evaluated by using RevMan 5.3 software. Besides, the bias assessment of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluation) system was applied to assess the overall quality of the evidence.

resultsA total of 10 studies involving 998 participants were included in this study. Compared to hyaluronic acid injection alone, the combined therapy significantly reduced pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS) and improved the ER and knee function on the Lysholm knee score (LKSS). Of these, the pooled LKSS (MD = 8.09, 95% CI = [7.02, 9.16],

conclusionCurrent evidence suggests that acupuncture therapy combined with hyaluronic acid injection is more effective in alleviating pain, improving the ER and knee function compared with hyaluronic acid injection alone. However, considering the low quality, small size, and high risk of the studies identified in this meta-analysis, more higher methodological quality, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are needed to confirm the results.

Identifiers

PMID32015753
PMCPMC6982364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.