ArticleNature human behaviour2020
The Confidence Database.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Across-subject correlation between confidence and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the Confidence Database.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Pooled it
- Reliability of LLMs as medical assistants for the general public: a randomized preregistered study.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Metacognition and metacognitive monitoring in aging.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Introducing openESM: A database of openly available experience sampling datasets.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Modeling the cognitive processes of accepting clinical decision support.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- dynConfiR: An R package for sequential sampling models of decision confidence.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Dopamine Dynamics in the Nucleus Accumbens Reflect Confidence in Detecting the Occurrence and Nonoccurrence of Visual Signals in Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- A large-scale dataset of choice and response-time data in intertemporal choice.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Psychophysical dissection of temporal error monitoring.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- Metacognitive ability is associated with reduced emotion suppression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Response Time as a Proxy for Decision Confidence: Insights From Type-2 ROC Analysis.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
- Reappraising intuitions about consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Physicians' metacognition in medical decision-making.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Large-scale experimental investigation of the reliability of confidence measures.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Individual differences do not mask effects of unconscious processing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- The order of task decisions and confidence ratings has little effect on metacognition.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- A dream EEG and mentation database.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Neural mechanisms of resource allocation in working memory.Science advances · 2025Article
- Investigation of mitochondrial DNA methylation-related prognostic biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
83 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how people rate their confidence is critical for the characterization of a wide range of perceptual, memory, motor and cognitive processes. To enable the continued exploration of these processes, we created a large database of confidence studies spanning a broad set of paradigms, participant populations and fields of study. The data from each study are structured in a common, easy-to-use format that can be easily imported and analysed using multiple software packages. Each dataset is accompanied by an explanation regarding the nature of the collected data. At the time of publication, the Confidence Database (which is available at https://osf.io/s46pr/) contained 145 datasets with data from more than 8,700 participants and almost 4 million trials. The database will remain open for new submissions indefinitely and is expected to continue to grow. Here we show the usefulness of this large collection of datasets in four different analyses that provide precise estimations of several foundational confidence-related effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.